BNS Section 55: Abettor Present When Offense is Committed

Section 55 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) is part of Chapter 4 of BNS – Abetment, Criminal Conspiracy And Attempt Of Abetment. It further elaborates on the liability of an abettor who is present when the offense is committed, specifying that their physical presence and potential role in the crime hold them accountable, even if they did not directly participate in carrying out the illegal act. This section clarifies that the mere presence of an abettor can constitute an act of support or encouragement, making them liable for the offense.

The provision ensures that those who contribute to the commission of a crime by being present at the scene, and thereby aiding its execution, are not exempt from punishment. It emphasizes that abettors who are physically present during the crime will face legal consequences for their role in facilitating the unlawful act.

Definition of BNS Section 55

Section 55 of the Bharatiya nyay sanhitha BNS 2023 States:
Whenever any person, who is absent would be liable to be punished as an abettor, is present when the act or offence for which he would be punishable in consequence of the abetment is committed, he shall be deemed to have committed such act or offence.

Explanation and Illustration of Section 55 (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023)

This provision addresses the legal liability of individuals involved in abetment when they are physically present during the commission of the crime they abetted. It effectively escalates their role from an indirect participant (abettor) to a direct perpetrator. Here's the explanation:

Key Legal Concept

Abettor in Absence: Normally, a person who incites, aids, or encourages another to commit an offense (abetment) is punished for their role, even if they are not physically present at the crime scene

Abettor in Presence: If the abettor is physically present at the time and place of the offense, their involvement is considered more direct and culpable. The law assumes that their presence signifies approval, support, or direct participation in the crime.

Legal Consequence:

The person present during the offense is no longer treated merely as an abettor but is deemed to have committed the offense themselves.

This legal presumption simplifies prosecution by holding the individual equally liable as the principal offender.

Example Scenario:

1. Absent Abettor:

A person plans and encourages another to commit a robbery but remains at home while the crime occurs. Here, they are punishable as an abettor.

2. Present Abettor:

If the same person accompanies the robber to the scene and witnesses the robbery, they are considered to have committed the robbery themselves, regardless of whether they physically participated in the act.

Purpose of the Provision:

Prevent Passive Participation: This rule deters individuals from being complicit in crimes by simply "being there" and letting the offense occur.

Ensure Accountability: Physical presence can often embolden the principal offender or serve as a form of assistance, making the abettor equally culpable.

Promote Justice: By treating present abettors as principal offenders, the law closes loopholes where individuals might evade stricter punishment by claiming indirect involvement.

Significance:

This provision strengthens the justice system by ensuring that anyone who contributes to the commission of a crime—whether through abetment or presence—is held fully accountable for their actions.

Disclaimer:

The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

Key Points of BNS 55

BNS-55 addresses the legal implications of abetting serious offences, such as those punishable by death or life imprisonment, even if the offence itself is not committed. Key aspects of this section include:

1. Abetment

Definition: Abetment involves encouraging, assisting, or instigating someone to commit an offence.

Types: This includes providing resources, planning, or even offering moral support to the potential offender.

2. Punishment for Abetment of Serious Offences (Not Committed)

Covered Offences: Applies to abetment of crimes punishable by death or life imprisonment.

Punishment (Clause 1):

If the offence is not committed, the abettor may face imprisonment for up to seven years and may also be fined.

This ensures accountability for attempts to promote or aid such serious crimes, even if unsuccessful.

Default Provision: If no specific penalty for abetment is outlined elsewhere, this clause provides a standard punishment.

3. Aggravated Abetment with Injury (Clause 2)

Injury Caused: If the abetment results in an act causing harm, even if the primary offence is not completed, the consequences are more severe.

Punishment (Clause 2):

The abettor may be imprisoned for up to fourteen years and fined.

This increases liability when the abetment leads to actual harm, despite the crime remaining incomplete.

4. Imprisonment "of Either Description"

Refers to either rigorous imprisonment (with hard labor) or simple imprisonment (without hard labor), providing the court flexibility to determine the punishment based on case severity.

Differences Between Section 55 of BNS 2023 and its equivalent IPC section

This section outlines the key differences between Sections 55 and and its equivalent Indian Penal Code (IPC Section 115), focusing on their distinct approaches to definitions, interpretations, and legal principles within the framework of criminal law.

BNS Sections/ Subsections	Subject	IPC Sections	Summary of comparison
55	Abetment of offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life.	115	No change.

Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

FAQs about Section 55 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS)

What does Section 55 of the BNS cover?

Section 55 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita addresses the consequences of failing to perform a contract within an agreed time when time is essential. If one party doesn’t perform by the deadline, the other party may void the contract and seek compensation for any losses incurred.

When is time considered 'of the essence' in a contract under Section 55?

Time is typically “of the essence” when explicitly stated in the contract or implied due to the nature of the agreement, like perishable goods or urgent services. If time is essential and breached, the non-defaulting party may void the contract and claim damages.

Can a contract still be enforced if time is not specified as essential under Section 55?

Yes, if time isn’t stipulated as essential, the contract may still be enforceable. However, significant delays can void the agreement if they cause harm to the other party. The courts interpret whether time was crucial based on the contract's nature and surrounding circumstances.

What remedies are available if a party breaches an essential time obligation under Section 55?

If a party breaches an essential time obligation, the other party can void the contract, withdraw from obligations, and seek damages. The compensation aims to cover any financial losses or inconvenience suffered due to the non-performance within the agreed timeline.

How have courts interpreted Section 55 of the BNS in landmark cases?

Courts often interpret Section 55 based on contract specifics and industry standards. Landmark cases clarify that time is generally essential in commercial contracts involving perishable or time-sensitive goods, while in immovable property deals, time is not usually essential unless explicitly agreed upon.

Does Section 55 apply to all offences?

No, Section 55 is applicable only if the mistaken belief negates the essential criminal intent required for the specific offence. It does not apply if intent or recklessness remains present.

Is a genuine mistake of fact always sufficient to avoid liability under Section 55?

Not necessarily. The mistake must be both genuine and reasonable. If the mistake was due to negligence or recklessness, the defense may not apply.