Consult an Expert
Business Setup
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTax & Compliance
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTrademark & IP
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backDocumentation
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backOthers
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backConsult an Expert
Business Setup
Tax & Compliance
Trademark & IP
Documentation
Others
More
Consult an Expert
Business Setup
International Business Setup
Company Name Search
Licenses & Registrations
Web Development
Tax & Compliance
GST and Other Indirect Tax
Changes in Pvt Ltd Company
Changes In Limited Liability Partnership
Mandatory Annual Filings
Labour Compliance
Accounting & Tax
Trademark & IP
Trademark
Design Registration
Documentation
Free Legal Documents
Business Contracts
Personal & Family
Notices
HR Policies
Others
Calculator
NGO Registration
NGO Compliance
Licenses & Registrations
Name Change & Other Conditiions
File an e-FIR
Marriage
File a Consumer Complaint
Lawyer Services
Login
Section 52 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) is part of Chapter 4 of BNS – abetment, criminal Conspiracy, And Attempt Of Abetment. It outlines the liability of an abettor when the act that was committed differs from the one originally abetted. This section ensures that the abettor is held accountable even if the outcome of the crime is not exactly as intended, as long as the act that was carried out is a natural consequence of the abetment.
The provision aims to ensure that those who instigate, assist, or encourage a crime are not exempt from liability if the perpetrator commits a different act than originally planned, as long as it remains connected to the abetted crime. This serves to reinforce the responsibility of the abettor and ensure justice is served, regardless of any variations in the specific act committed.
Section 52 of the Bharatiya nyaya sanhitha (BNS) 2023 States:
If the act for which the abettor is liable under section 51 is committed in addition to the act abetted and constitutes a distinct offence, the abettor is liable to punishment for each of the offences.
A provokes B to forcibly resist a distress action carried out by a public servant. Acting on this provocation, B resists the distress and, in doing so, voluntarily inflicts grievous hurt on the officer executing the distress. As a result, B is guilty of both resisting the distress and voluntarily causing grievous hurt, making B liable for punishment for both offences. Furthermore, if A was aware that B was likely to voluntarily cause grievous hurt while resisting the distress, A would also be held liable for punishment for each of these offences.
Disclaimer
The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.
Primary and Additional Offences: Section 52 covers situations where an abettor instigates or aids another person to commit a crime, and in the process, the person abettor commits an additional act constituting a separate offence.
The abettor is held accountable for both the original offence they encouraged and any additional offences, provided they were aware that such further crimes were likely to occur. Both the abettor and the principal offender can be punished for every distinct offence committed during the incident.
Liability for Multiple Offences: If the abetted act results in an independent and distinct offence beyond the original act, the abettor is liable for all offences. This provision ensures accountability for both the abettor and the person abetted if multiple crimes arise from the same series of events.
Knowledge of Additional Offences: The abettor's liability for additional offences depends on their knowledge or reasonable belief that such offences were likely to occur during the commission of the original act.
This section outlines the key differences between Sections 52 and and its equivalent to IPC Section 112, focusing on their distinct approaches to definitions, interpretations, and legal principles within the framework of criminal law.
BNS Sections/ Subsections | Subject | IPC Sections | Summary of comparison |
---|---|---|---|
52 | Abettor when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done. | 112 | Words “the last preceding section” is replaced by “section 51”. |
Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:
Talk To Experts
Calculators
Downloads
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service , Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy and Refund Policy © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.
Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.