Consult an Expert
Business Setup
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTax & Compliance
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTrademark & IP
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backDocumentation
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backOthers
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backConsult an Expert
Business Setup
Tax & Compliance
Trademark & IP
Documentation
Others
More
Consult an Expert
Business Setup
International Business Setup
Company Name Search
Licenses & Registrations
Web Development
Tax & Compliance
GST and Other Indirect Tax
Changes in Pvt Ltd Company
Changes In Limited Liability Partnership
Mandatory Annual Filings
Labour Compliance
Accounting & Tax
Trademark & IP
Trademark
Design Registration
Documentation
Free Legal Documents
Business Contracts
Personal & Family
Notices
HR Policies
Others
Calculator
NGO Registration
NGO Compliance
Licenses & Registrations
Name Change & Other Conditiions
File an e-FIR
Marriage
File a Consumer Complaint
Lawyer Services
Login
Section 50 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) is part of Chapter 4 Of BNS – Abetment, Criminal Conspiracy And Attempt Of Abetment. It addresses the punishment for abetment when the person who carries out the act does so with a different intention from that of the abettor. This section ensures that the abettor is still held responsible, even if the ultimate act is carried out with a differing or unintended motive, as long as the original instigation or assistance led to the commission of the crime.
The provision aims to prevent individuals from escaping liability by claiming that the outcome of the act differed from their original intent. It ensures that the abettor remains accountable for their role in facilitating the crime, regardless of whether the actual act deviates from the original purpose, maintaining justice for the instigation of unlawful conduct.
Section 50 of the Bharatiya nyay sanhitha 2023 States:
Whoever abets the commission of an offence shall, if the person abetted does the act with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been committed if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other.
Section 50 deals with cases where there is divergence in the abettor and the person who actually commits the offence either as regards the intent or knowledge while doing the same.
Abettor's Intention: Abettor commits with specific intent or knowledge by doing or knowingly facilitating, encouraging etc.
Person Abetted's Intention: Person committing act may intend otherwise or even know otherwise.
Punishment According to Abettor's Intention
Important Implication
Ensures the abettor remains liable, even if the person committing the crime acts with a different intention or knowledge. Liability is based on the abettor's original intent or knowledge.
Illustration:
A engages B to burn down a competitor's godown for the destruction of goods amounting to ₹10 lakh. A's motive is only economic damage—he does not wish anyone to get injured. However, while fire was being set, B locks up a security guard and gets him killed, knowing well that he would get killed and it was not A's intent or knowledge.
Explanation:
Abettor's Intention (A): A had intended only for destruction of property without injury to life.
Person Abetted's Intention (B): B acted with the knowledge and intention to kill, deviating from A's original plan.
Under Section 50, A (the abettor) will be punished for the offence of abetment of arson as per their original intention, not for murder, since they neither intended nor had knowledge of B's actions.
This would ensure that there is fairness in attributing criminal liability to A, holding them accountable for their specific intention while preventing unjust punishment for actions beyond their knowledge or control.
Disclaimer
The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.
1. Abetment and Diverging Intentions
Section 50 deals with scenarios where the intentions or knowledge of the abettor (the one who incites or assists in a crime) differ from those of the person committing the act (the abetted).
This section outlines the key differences between Section 50 and its equivalent to IPC Section 110 focusing on their distinct approaches to definitions, interpretations and legal principles within the framework of criminal law.
BNS Sections/ Subsections | Subject | IPC Sections | Summary of comparison |
---|---|---|---|
50 | Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act with different intention from that of abettor. | 110 | No change |
Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:
Talk To Experts
Calculators
Downloads
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service , Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy and Refund Policy © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.
Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.