Business Setup

Tax & Compliance

Trademark & IP

Documentation

Others

user-login
Consult an Expert

Consult an Expert

Right Arrow
Business Setup

Business Setup

Right Arrow
Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Right Arrow
Trademark & IP

Trademark & IP

Right Arrow
Documentation

Documentation

Right Arrow
Others

Others

Right Arrow
More

More

Right Arrow

Login

Section 27 of BNS is part of CHAPTER 3 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Act. Good faith for the benefit of a child under twelve years of age or of a person of unsound mind, although done without his consent is covered under this Act. Any act done in good faith for the benefit of any child under twelve years of age, or of a person of unsound mind, of whose consent, if he were capable of giving consent, the person charged or that person himself has obtained, does not render him liable to punishment for such act if, in doing such thing, if death or grievous hurt had resulted there from, he would have been punishable under Section 299 or Section 300.

This section underlines the critical roles of intent and guardianship in action that may cause harm; it reflects a compassionate law framework that is sensitive to the plight of caregivers especially in medical settings where risk of intervention may be very substantial. The law, therefore, favors actions intended in good faith to protect those who cannot speak for themselves while protecting the good-faith actor and still providing accountability for harmful or exploitative actions.

Definition of BNS Section 27

Nothing which is done in good faith for the benefit of a person under twelve years of age, or person of unsound mind, by, or by consent, either express or implied, of the guardian or other person having lawful charge of that person, is an offense by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause or be known by the doer to be likely to cause to that person:

Provided that this exception shall not extend to––
(a) the intentional causing of death, or to the attempting to cause death;
(b) the doing of anything which the person doing it knows to be likely to cause death, for any purpose other than the preventing of death or grievous hurt, or the curing of any grievous disease or infirmity;
(c) the voluntary causing of grievous hurt, or to the attempting to cause grievous hurt, unless it be for the purpose of preventing death or grievous hurt, or the curing of any grievous disease or infirmity;
(d) the abetment of any offence, to the committing of which offence it would not extend.

Explanation and Illustration of Section 27 (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023)

The fundamental characteristic of this chapter is that if an act is done with a good intent to help, and it is carried out with the explicit or implied consent of a guardian, then that action cannot be treated as a criminal offence merely because of harm that may result from it. However, this good-faith exception is narrowly defined and does not apply in certain critical situations, which include:

  • Causing of Death Intentionally-Any act done with intent to cause death or intended to cause death is kept out of this protection
  • Knowledge of Likely Death In case a person knows his act is likely to result in death and does the same for any reason other than preventing death, grievous hurt, or curing disease, this exception does not hold good
  • Voluntarily causing grievous hurt: It also includes voluntarily causing grievous hurt without the intention to prevent death or such harm.
  • Abetment of Offences: Section does not extend to abetment of any offence, or the act which incites and facilitates any crime.


  • Illustration

    Let us take an illustration in order to explain these principles :

    Facts: A, a parent, acts in good faith to benefit his child by agreeing to surgery to remove kidney stones. A knows that surgery carries significant risks, one of which is death, but A does not desire to cause death. Under these circumstances, A's actions come within the Section 27 exception because his principal purpose was to cure his child's illness.

    This section deals with the issues of intent and consent on criminal law determinations relating to potentially harmful acts to ensure that the persons acting with the best interest of weaker parties are not made criminals but that such action has a strong possibility of severely harming or exploiting the parties in question.

    Disclaimer: The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

    Key Points of BNS 27

  • Good Faith for Benefit:The act must be done in good faith and for the benefit of the minor or person with mental illness.

  • Consent by Guardian:Consent from the legal guardian or responsible person is required, either express or implied.

  • Harm with Consent: Harm-causing actions are not offenses if performed with the guardian's consent and for the individual’s benefit.

  • Exceptions (Proviso): Does not apply to:
  • Intentional death or attempt to cause death.
  • Harm likely to cause death, except in life-saving situations.
  • Voluntary grievous hurt, unless for preventing death or treating illness.
  • Abetment of offenses not justified by this section.

  • Purpose of the Provision: Protects caretakers who act in good faith for the well-being of minors or mentally ill individuals.

  • Limitations: Does not cover malicious actions or unjustifiable harm, especially if it involves death or grievous injury, unless for life-saving or medical reasons.
    1. Differences Between Section 27 of BNS 2023 and its Equivalent IPC Section

      This section outlines the key differences between Section 27 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2024 and its equivalent Indian Penal Code (IPC Section 89), focusing on their distinct approaches.

      BNS Sections/ Subsections Subject IPC Sections Summary of comparison
      27 Act done in good faith for the benefit of a child or person, by or by consent of the guardian. 89 The words ‘insane person’ are replaced with ’person of unsound mind’.

      Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

      Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

      • Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
      • Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
      • Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
      • Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

      FAQs about Section 27 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

      questionmark

      What offence is defined under BNS Section 27?

      Section 27 of the BNS pertains to actions taken in good faith for the benefit of a child or a person of unsound mind, either by the guardian or with the guardian's consent.

        questionmark

        Which chapter does Section 27 belong to in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023?

        Section 27 is part of CHAPTER III, titled GENERAL EXCEPTIONS, in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Act.

          questionmark

          How does Section 27 protect actions taken on behalf of vulnerable individuals?

          This section underscores that actions performed in good faith, aimed at benefitting children or individuals deemed of unsound mind, may not be viewed as criminal, provided they involve proper consent from guardians.

            questionmark

            What criteria are considered to determine if an act was done in good faith under Section 27?

            The assessment includes evaluating the intent behind the action, the nature of the benefit provided, and whether the guardian's consent was obtained appropriately.

              questionmark

              Are there other relevant provisions related to guardianship in Chapter III of the BNS?

              Yes, Chapter III may include additional provisions addressing the role of guardians in protecting the rights and interests of vulnerable individuals, as well as outlining the legal framework for their actions.

                questionmark

                Can acts done on behalf of a child or person of unsound mind be defended under Section 27?

                Yes, if an act is performed with the guardian's consent, in good faith, and with the intention of benefiting the child or person of unsound mind, Section 27 provides a defence against criminal liability, even if harm results.

                  questionmark

                  Does Section 27 apply in cases where harm occurs despite the act being in good faith?

                  Section 27 can still apply if harm occurs, provided the act was done in good faith for the benefit of the child or person of unsound mind and was consented to by the guardian. However, if the harm was excessive or unreasonable, liability may still be possible.

                     BNS Section 27