Consult an Expert
Business Setup
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTax & Compliance
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTrademark & IP
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backDocumentation
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backOthers
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backConsult an Expert
Business Setup
Tax & Compliance
Trademark & IP
Documentation
Others
More
Consult an Expert
Business Setup
International Business Setup
Company Name Search
Licenses & Registrations
Web Development
Tax & Compliance
GST and Other Indirect Tax
Changes in Pvt Ltd Company
Changes In Limited Liability Partnership
Mandatory Annual Filings
Labour Compliance
Accounting & Tax
Trademark & IP
Trademark
Design Registration
Documentation
Free Legal Documents
Business Contracts
Personal & Family
Notices
HR Policies
Others
Calculator
NGO Registration
NGO Compliance
Licenses & Registrations
Name Change & Other Conditiions
File an e-FIR
Marriage
File a Consumer Complaint
Lawyer Services
Login
Section 26 of BNS is part of CHAPTER 3 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Act. It addresses the legal nuances surrounding actions taken in good faith that may cause harm but are intended to benefit another person. This provision stipulates that if an act is not intended to cause death, it cannot be deemed an offence simply because it results in harm, provided that the act is performed for the benefit of the person involved, who has given their consent—either expressly or implicitly.
This section emphasises the importance of intent and consent in legal considerations of harm. It reflects a compassionate approach to situations where individuals may have to make difficult decisions, particularly in medical or caregiving contexts, where the risk of harm may be present despite good intentions. By recognising the role of consent and good faith, the law aims to protect individuals who act in the best interest of others while navigating the complexities of potential harm.
Nothing, which is not intended to cause death, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, or be known by the doer to be likely to cause, to any person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, and who has given a consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm, or to take the risk of that harm.
This Section is provided that the act is done for the benefit of the person involved and the person involved has given his consent-expressed or implied. This chapter focuses on the intent and consent that will define the legal liability of doing harm. It points out that in some practices, like medical practice, there is a possibility of doing harm despite the fact that the intentions behind such an action are pure. The law is concerned with protecting those who make decisions for the benefit of others, provided such decisions are taken with their consent and in good faith.
Example:
A is a surgeon who carries out a highly risky operation on a patient Z who suffers from very excruciating pains. A very well knows that there would always be a risk of death to be taken; however, at the same time, A also never intends to actually kill Z; instead, he strictly intends to put an end to the unbearable sufferings of Z and only after Z gives full prior informed consent for the operations, then he operates upon the patient.
In this particular case, although the operation itself was dangerous, A has done nothing wrong under Section 26 because the act was made in good faith for Z's benefit and Z had consented to the risk. This example shows the law's sensitivity towards the subtleties involved with the issue of consent and intent, especially in life or death situations where people are concerned.
Disclaimer The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.
This section clarifies that harm caused in good faith, with consent, and for the benefit of the harmed person, is not an offence, upholding the principle of consensual risk-taking when the action is believed to benefit the person suffering the harm.
This section outlines the key differences between Section 26 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and its equivalent to IPC section 88, focusing on their distinct approaches .
BNS Sections/ Subsections | Subject | IPC Sections | Summary of comparison |
---|---|---|---|
26 | Act not intended to cause death, done by consent in good faith for a person's benefit. | 88 | No change. |
Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:
Talk To Experts
Calculators
Downloads
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service , Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy and Refund Policy © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.
Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.