Consult an Expert
Business Setup
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTax & Compliance
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTrademark & IP
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backDocumentation
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backOthers
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backConsult an Expert
Business Setup
Tax & Compliance
Trademark & IP
Documentation
Others
More
Consult an Expert
Business Setup
International Business Setup
Company Name Search
Licenses & Registrations
Web Development
Tax & Compliance
GST and Other Indirect Tax
Changes in Pvt Ltd Company
Changes In Limited Liability Partnership
Mandatory Annual Filings
Labour Compliance
Accounting & Tax
Trademark & IP
Trademark
Design Registration
Documentation
Free Legal Documents
Business Contracts
Personal & Family
Notices
HR Policies
Others
Calculator
NGO Registration
NGO Compliance
Licenses & Registrations
Name Change & Other Conditiions
File an e-FIR
Marriage
File a Consumer Complaint
Lawyer Services
Login
Section 24 of BNS is part of CHAPTER 3 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Act. It relates to criminal intent in certain cases as an important matter to ascertain. It says that whenever an act is not a crime unless done with knowledge or intent of certain kind or things, it makes all the difference whether a particular act was done by an individual who, at the time when he did, was unconscious by reason of want of the use of his understanding by reason of intoxication, and this shall be deemed insufficient to show he did not know or, did not believe or that he was not aware, that he was doing something which he did know, or did believe, or was aware he was likely to do.
This reflects a subtle understanding of criminal responsibility, which is that voluntary intoxication does not exculpate people from liability for acts requiring intent. The law makes such a distinction between voluntary and involuntary intoxication to achieve justice while taking into account the human behaviour complexities that are involved in substance use cases. This provision keeps the individual liable for their actions but promotes responsible conduct about the intake of intoxicating substances.
In cases where an act done is not an offence unless done with a particular knowledge or intent, a person who does the act in a state of intoxication shall be liable to be dealt with as if he had the same knowledge as he would have had if he had not been intoxicated, unless the thing which intoxicated him was administered to him without his knowledge or against his will.
This declaration makes a provision stating that if the act is not considered an offence unless done with a particular knowledge or intent, then a person who does the said act while intoxicated can be held liable as if they had the required knowledge. The intoxication has to be voluntary.
Under this section, one will always be liable for his actions irrespective of whether intoxicated or not so long as he has volunteered to take such intoxicating substances. This section addresses the principle that voluntary intoxication does not remove the ability to form intent or knowledge required by some crimes.
Example:
Suppose that an intoxicated person, while in such a condition, intentionally damages property belonging to another. Because the crime requires specific intent, the intoxicated person may be convicted as if she had the necessary intent since she drank or otherwise voluntarily ingested the alcohol or drugs.
However, section 24 would not operate in the same way, for instance, if the person who caused damage to some other's property was intoxicated, without his knowledge that he was being drugged at a party. Under such circumstances, since his intoxication was involuntary, there would be no liability attributed to the offence committed under the influence of intoxicating substances because he could neither know nor intend to act.
This provision thus reflects the commitment of the legal system to accountability, but at the same time, it recognizes the issues surrounding intoxication and fair treatment in court.
Disclaimer: The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.
This section outlines the key differences between Section 24 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and its equivalent to IPC Section 86, focusing on their distinct approaches.
BNS Sections/ Subsections | Subject | IPC Sections | Summary of comparison |
---|---|---|---|
24 | Offence requiring a particular intent or knowledge committed by one who is intoxicated. | 86 | No change. |
Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:
Talk To Experts
Calculators
Downloads
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service , Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy and Refund Policy © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.
Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.