Consult an Expert
Business Setup
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTax & Compliance
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTrademark & IP
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backDocumentation
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backOthers
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backConsult an Expert
Business Setup
Tax & Compliance
Trademark & IP
Documentation
Others
More
Consult an Expert
Business Setup
International Business Setup
Company Name Search
Licenses & Registrations
Web Development
Tax & Compliance
GST and Other Indirect Tax
Changes in Pvt Ltd Company
Changes In Limited Liability Partnership
Mandatory Annual Filings
Labour Compliance
Accounting & Tax
Trademark & IP
Trademark
Design Registration
Documentation
Free Legal Documents
Business Contracts
Personal & Family
Notices
HR Policies
Others
Calculator
NGO Registration
NGO Compliance
Licenses & Registrations
Name Change & Other Conditiions
File an e-FIR
Marriage
File a Consumer Complaint
Lawyer Services
Login
Section 196 falls under Chapter 11 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Chapter 11 covers offences against the public tranquillity. Each section under this chapter deals with different offences related to actions that are intended to affect law and order in the public domain. Section 196 specifically deals with the incitement of disharmony between various identity groups. Let us take a closer look at its provisions.
Section 196 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 states:
(1) Whoever—
(a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or through electronic communication or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities; or
(b) commits any act which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to disturb the public tranquillity; or
(c) organises any exercise, movement, drill or other similar activity intending that the participants in such activity shall use or be trained to use criminal force or violence or knowing it to be likely that the participants in such activity will use or be trained to use criminal force or violence, or participates in such activity intending to use or be trained to use criminal force or violence or knowing it to be likely that the participants in such activity will use or be trained to use criminal force or violence, against any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community and such activity for any reason whatsoever causes or is likely to cause fear or alarm or a feeling of insecurity amongst members of such religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
(2) Whoever commits an offence specified in sub-section (1) in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.
This section deals with instigation of disharmony, riots or affrays specifically on the basis of identity. There are many social groups that a person identifies with in different contexts. At any given time a person may identify with a group on the basis of his regional identity, religion, mother tongue, caste, profession, hobby or even interests, all at the same time. The groups come together on the basis of common beliefs, interests, inherent qualities and even specific peculiarities and unique traits. And since these groups offer a sense of belonging to a person, their association with the group assumes an emotional foundation and any derogatory insinuation towards the group can elicit a volatile reaction from its members. The purpose of section 196 is to establish criminal provisions against such actions that can cause disharmony or friction amongst such groups which will result in disruption of public law and order. This section has been divided into two subsections, with subsection (1) further divided into three more subsections. Let us break down some of the key terms mentioned in this section to gain a better insight.
Section 196 (1)(a) defines the first offence that is prosecutable under this section, which is instigating disharmony amongst identity groups by way of language, either through speech, writing, signage or visual media. It further states that the conveyance of such communication can be digital or otherwise, clarifying that the medium through which such a communication is not relevant as long as it has been communicated in a coherent and comprehensible manner. The defining aspect of this offence is, simply put, “promotes or attempts to promote disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will.”
In other words, if a person, by use of any language and conveyed through any medium, intentionally instigates disharmony between two or more identity groups by making insinuations against their specific and unique traits, beliefs, objectives or interests, then such person will be considered an offender under the provisions of section 196 (1) (a).
It must be noted here, that the section also says that the instigation can be on any other ground whatsoever. This is to clarify that the instigation needn't just be on the grounds of the group’s beliefs or traits or objectives alone. Anything that instigates disharmony between two identity groups falls under the provisions of this section.
Section 196 (1) (b) addresses the same offence as defined in subsection (1)(a) except it deals with instigations made by way of actions rather than words or language. So if a person performs any action that instigates disharmony between identity groups through any medium, physical, electronic or otherwise, shall be considered an offender under the provisions of this section.
Similarly, Section 196 (1) (c) provides for a larger picture where one doesn’t just individually attack a group but organises several individuals to jointly make such an instigation. And this section specifically deals with violence and criminal force. It states that any activity organised to cause violence or to train people to cause violence against any identity group shall be considered an offence under this section. And it further provides that even if the direct intent of such activity is to not promote such violence but there is a very evident likelihood that the participants of this activity shall participate in violence due to what has been communicated to them in the course of the activity, then it shall still be considered an offence, even if the instigation does not take place. It also states that both, the organiser and the participants of such an activity, will be treated equally culpable, irrespective of whether the organiser has personally carried out such an instigation.
The punishment prescribed under this section is imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both, if deemed appropriate by the judge, depending on the severity of the case.
Section 196 (2) states that if the offences described in subsection (1) is carried out in a place of religious importance or performance, then the offence will take a more severe tone under the BNS and the punishment will result in imprisonment which may extend to five years, instead of the three years prescribed under subsection (1) apart from a mandatory fine which shall be prescribed by the judge based on severity of the case.
Disclaimer: The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.
This section deals with: Causing disharmony between groups with prejudicial acts.
Description of offence:
The BNS came into force on July 1, 2024, effectively replacing the Indian Penal Code. Section 196 of BNS replaces IPC Section 153A. Let us look at the changes that have been made in the provisions of the new section in comparison to the old one.
BNS Sections/Subsections | Subject | IPC Sections | Summary of Comparison |
---|---|---|---|
196 | Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony. | 153A | The word “or through electronic communication” is added as one of the modes of spreading disharmony, etc. No change in provisions for offence. |
Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:
Talk To Experts
Calculators
Downloads
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service , Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy and Refund Policy © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.
Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.