Business Setup

Tax & Compliance

Trademark & IP

Documentation

Others

user-login
Consult an Expert

Consult an Expert

Right Arrow
Business Setup

Business Setup

Right Arrow
Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Right Arrow
Trademark & IP

Trademark & IP

Right Arrow
Documentation

Documentation

Right Arrow
Others

Others

Right Arrow
More

More

Right Arrow

Login

Section 19 of BNS is part of CHAPTER 3 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Act. It talks about acts that, except for criminal intent, fall within the situation that though aimed to cause harm are not considered a crime when done without criminal intent and with a genuine intention of saving persons or property from worse evils. This catches once again the recognition of people having to do things that by chance might lead to causing harm when every attempt was made to avoid worse dangers.

The section thus highlights the importance of intent and the context in which the act is performed, thus allowing a legal framework that balances accountability with the realities of emergency situations. It establishes the justification for such actions depending on whether the imminent threat warranted the risk taken and fosters a nuanced understanding of responsibility in crisis scenarios.

Definition of BNS Section 19

Nothing is an offence merely by reason of its being done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause harm, if it be done without any criminal intention to cause harm, and in good faith for the purpose of preventing or avoiding other harm to person or property.

Explanation.—It is a question of fact in such a case whether the harm to be prevented or avoided was of such a nature and so imminent as to justify or excuse the risk of doing the act with the knowledge that it was likely to cause harm.

Explanation and Illustration of Section 19 (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023)

This section provides the context and intention when assessing legal liability in circumstances where action taken can cause harmful effects.

Good Faith Acts: This section explains that individuals who act in good faith in trying to avoid greater danger are not liable for subsequent harms. It is more concerned with why the act took place rather than with the effects.

Determinative Analysis of Imminence: It is, therefore, necessary to establish whether the evil sought to be averted was of such a character that it justified the risk; this must be determined by fact-finding into the circumstances of the act.

Balancing Accountability and Necessity: Recognising that, in an emergency, people sometimes must act in ways that themselves threaten serious harm, this chapter attempts to balance the principle of personal responsibility with the reality of an emergency.

Illustrations (a):
A, being a master of a vessel, has to make a grave choice of running over boat B, which had dozens of passengers, or he may deviate from his course to possibly hit boat C with two passengers on board. If A in good faith turns aside to save the passengers of boat B, although he realises this may endanger boat C, he is not committing an offense, if the danger he sought to avoid was grave enough to warrant such risk.

Illustration (b): If there was a major fire, A decides to pull down neighbouring houses so that the flames may not progress and endanger people's lives or property. If it were established that there was an imminent danger of fire that was grave enough to explain A's actions, then he would not commit any offence.

These illustrations exemplify the doctrine that acts taken in a good-faith effort to prevent imminent harm may be done without regard to unintended consequences, which reiterates the notion of reasonable conduct in times of emergency.

Disclaimer: The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

Key Points of BNS 19

  • Knowledge of Likely Harm: Knowing an act may cause harm doesn’t make it an offence if done to prevent bigger danger
  • Absence of Criminal Intention: The person has no malicious intent; the act isn’t meant to harm
  • Good Faith: Acted with honest belief that their actions were necessary to avoid a worse outcome
  • Purpose of Preventing Greater Harm: Harm was caused to avoid a bigger harm, like breaking a door to save someone from a fire
  • No Offence: Harmful acts done in good faith to prevent greater harm aren’t considered offences
  • Illustration: Damaging a vehicle to free someone in an emergency is excused as the intent was to save a life
  • Objective: BNS-19 protects individuals who act to prevent greater harm without malicious intent.
    1. Differences Between Section 19 of BNS 2023 and its Equivalent IPC Section

      This section outlines the key differences between Section 19 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2024 and its equivalent Indian Penal Code (IPC Section 81), focusing on their distinct approaches.

      BNS Sections/ Subsections Subject IPC Sections Summary of comparison
      19 Act likely to cause harm, but done without criminal intent, and to prevent other harm. 81 Word ‘steam’ is excluded in the illustration.

      Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

      Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

      • Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
      • Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
      • Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
      • Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

      FAQs about Section 19 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

      questionmark

      What offence is defined under BNS 19?

      BNS Section 19 pertains to actions that may cause harm but are performed without criminal intent and are aimed at preventing greater harm.

        questionmark

        Which chapter of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 includes Section 19 of the BNS?

        Section 19 of the BNS is part of Chapter III, which addresses general exceptions in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Act.

          questionmark

          What is the significance of Section 19 in legal contexts?

          Section 19 is significant as it provides a legal defence for individuals who act to avert a greater danger, even if their actions inadvertently cause some harm.

            questionmark

            How does Section 19 define the relationship between intent and harm?

            Section 19 clarifies that lack of criminal intent in the face of potential harm can absolve an individual from liability, emphasising the motivation behind the action.

              questionmark

              Are there limitations to the defence provided by Section 19?

              Yes, the defence may not apply if the harm caused is disproportionate to the harm being prevented or if the action taken was unreasonable.

                questionmark

                Can Section 19 be invoked for all types of harmful actions?

                No, Section 19 specifically applies to situations where harm is caused in the context of attempting to prevent greater harm, and each case must be evaluated on its merits.

                  questionmark

                  What does BNS Section 19 state about an act likely to cause harm?

                  BNS Section 19 states that an act is not considered an offence merely because it is likely to cause harm if done without criminal intent and in good faith to prevent or avoid greater harm to persons or property.

                     BNS Section 19