Consult an Expert
Business Setup
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTax & Compliance
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTrademark & IP
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backDocumentation
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backOthers
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backConsult an Expert
Business Setup
Tax & Compliance
Trademark & IP
Documentation
Others
More
Consult an Expert
Business Setup
International Business Setup
Company Name Search
Licenses & Registrations
Web Development
Tax & Compliance
GST and Other Indirect Tax
Changes in Pvt Ltd Company
Changes In Limited Liability Partnership
Mandatory Annual Filings
Labour Compliance
Accounting & Tax
Trademark & IP
Trademark
Design Registration
Documentation
Free Legal Documents
Business Contracts
Personal & Family
Notices
HR Policies
Others
Calculator
NGO Registration
NGO Compliance
Licenses & Registrations
Name Change & Other Conditiions
File an e-FIR
Marriage
File a Consumer Complaint
Lawyer Services
Login
Section 16 of BNS is part of CHAPTER 3 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Act. It addresses the legal implications of actions taken in compliance with a court's judgement or order. This provision stipulates that any act carried out in pursuance of a court order remains free from criminal liability, even if the court may have lacked jurisdiction to issue that order, as long as the individual performing the act genuinely believes, in good faith, that the court had the authority to do so.
By establishing this protection, Section 16 reinforces the principle of adhering to judicial commands and aims to safeguard individuals from legal repercussions when acting upon perceived lawful directives. This section underscores the importance of good faith in ensuring the proper functioning of the judicial system.
Nothing which is done in pursuance of, or which is warranted by the judgement or order of, a Court; if done while such judgement or order remains in force, is an offence, notwithstanding the Court may have had no jurisdiction to pass such judgement or order, provided the person doing the act in good faith believes that the Court had such jurisdiction
The legal protection for acts done by a person under the compulsion of the judgement or order of any court has been given in section 16 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. This is to strengthen that acts done on the judgement or order issued by any court must be followed; however, these acts are not offences if the judgement or order is issued by the court without any jurisdiction.
Explanation
This section clearly states that nothing that is done in pursuance of an order or warrant issued by a court is to be deemed to be an offence, if such order or warrant is still in force. This exemption would apply irrespective of whether or not the court had any real jurisdiction.
Good Faith Belief: An important feature of this measure is that the person obliged to act by the judicial provision is required to do so in good faith, meaning they actually believe that he or she is entitled to enforce the judicial provision.
Fosters Compliance: Section 16 protects those who act under court orders thereby encouraging obedience to judicial decrees and integrity of the rule of law. It bars people from being subjected to legal sanctions for obeying what they believe is a valid judicial command.
Example:
A court issues an order of property seizure, and based on his belief that it was within the jurisdictional capacity of the court that issued it, an official implements it. Later, one discovers that the court did not have such jurisdiction to issue an order. However, still, no offence can be attached to an official because he did his work in good faith on the belief that what he was doing was actually implementing a valid court order.
This section restates the maxim that the rule of law requires strict obedience to judicial authority but recognises that jurisdictional matters are complicated. It therefore serves as a safety net for persons acting in good faith upon what they believe is a lawful order, and which, consequently, enhances confidence in the judicial process.
Disclaimer: The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.
This section outlines the key differences between Section 16 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and its equivalent to IPC Section 78, focusing on their distinct approaches.
BNS Sections/ Subsections | Subject | IPC Sections | Summary of comparison |
---|---|---|---|
16 | Act done pursuant to the judgement or order of Court | 78 | Words 'Court of Justice' is replaced by ‘Court’. |
Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:
Talk To Experts
Calculators
Downloads
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service , Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy and Refund Policy © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.
Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.