Consult an Expert
Business Setup
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTax & Compliance
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTrademark & IP
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backDocumentation
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backOthers
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backConsult an Expert
Business Setup
Tax & Compliance
Trademark & IP
Documentation
Others
More
Consult an Expert
Business Setup
International Business Setup
Company Name Search
Licenses & Registrations
Web Development
Tax & Compliance
GST and Other Indirect Tax
Changes in Pvt Ltd Company
Changes In Limited Liability Partnership
Mandatory Annual Filings
Labour Compliance
Accounting & Tax
Trademark & IP
Trademark
Design Registration
Documentation
Free Legal Documents
Business Contracts
Personal & Family
Notices
HR Policies
Others
Calculator
NGO Registration
NGO Compliance
Licenses & Registrations
Name Change & Other Conditiions
File an e-FIR
Marriage
File a Consumer Complaint
Lawyer Services
Login
Section 267 falls under Chapter 14 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Chapter 14 covers offences of false evidence and offences against public justice. Each section under this chapter deals with different offences related to matters that obstruct the delivery of public justice. Section specifically deals with disrupting judicial proceedings. Let us take a closer look at its provisions.
Section 267 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 states:
“Whoever, intentionally offers any insult, or causes any interruption to any public servant, while such public servant is sitting in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.”
This section is applicable to any person within the sovereign borders of India, whether citizen, resident or otherwise. It deals with the offence of affronting a public official presiding over a judicial proceeding. Let us break down the section to get a better understanding of it.
Offence
When a person presides over a judicial proceeding, he doesn’t represent himself personally or any particular identity. He represents the preeminence of the law which is the final and ultimate authority in a democracy. So when one addresses a person in that position, he or she must show their allegiance towards the law by conducting themselves with utmost respect and dignity.
This section provides for any act of insult or interruption directed towards a person presiding over a judicial proceeding. However, there is one qualifying condition. The insult or interruption must be intentional. Let us understand what that means-
Intentional insult - When a person, while addressing the chairperson of a judicial proceeding, talks down, speaks in a raised tone, uses words and language or makes gestures that aim to lower the dignity and demonstrate disrespect, it shall be considered an intentional insult.
Intentional interruption - When a person interjects during an address by the chairperson of a judicial proceeding with the intention of disrupting the flow, not letting the other person complete or to speak above what is being addressed, it shall be considered an intentional interruption.
The person performing the other actions need not be a person charged or convicted of a crime. When any person present during a judicial proceeding commits any of the above actions, he or she shall be considered an offender under the provisions of Section 267.
Punishment
Any person who deliberately insults or interrupts a public officer presiding over a judicial proceeding shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.
The above actions may not be an offence under this section if:
Disclaimer:
The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.
This section deals with: Interrupting or insulting presiding judge
Description of offence:
The BNS came into force on July 1, 2024, effectively replacing the Indian Penal Code. Section 267 of BNS replaces Section 228 of the IPC. Let us look at the changes that have been made in the provisions of the new section in comparison to the old one.
BNS Sections/Subsections | Subject | IPC Sections | Summary of Comparison |
---|---|---|---|
267 | Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding. | 228 | Upper limit of fine is increased from one thousand to five thousand rupees. |
Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:
Talk To Experts
Calculators
Downloads
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service , Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy and Refund Policy © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.
Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.