Business Setup

Tax & Compliance

Trademark & IP

Documentation

Others

user-login
Consult an Expert

Consult an Expert

Right Arrow
Business Setup

Business Setup

Right Arrow
Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Right Arrow
Trademark & IP

Trademark & IP

Right Arrow
Documentation

Documentation

Right Arrow
Others

Others

Right Arrow
More

More

Right Arrow

Login

Section 267 falls under Chapter 14 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Chapter 14 covers offences of false evidence and offences against public justice. Each section under this chapter deals with different offences related to matters that obstruct the delivery of public justice. Section specifically deals with disrupting judicial proceedings. Let us take a closer look at its provisions.

Definition of BNS Section 267

Section 267 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 states:

“Whoever, intentionally offers any insult, or causes any interruption to any public servant, while such public servant is sitting in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.”

Explanation and Illustration of BNS Section 267

This section is applicable to any person within the sovereign borders of India, whether citizen, resident or otherwise. It deals with the offence of affronting a public official presiding over a judicial proceeding. Let us break down the section to get a better understanding of it.

Offence

When a person presides over a judicial proceeding, he doesn’t represent himself personally or any particular identity. He represents the preeminence of the law which is the final and ultimate authority in a democracy. So when one addresses a person in that position, he or she must show their allegiance towards the law by conducting themselves with utmost respect and dignity.

This section provides for any act of insult or interruption directed towards a person presiding over a judicial proceeding. However, there is one qualifying condition. The insult or interruption must be intentional. Let us understand what that means-

Intentional insult - When a person, while addressing the chairperson of a judicial proceeding, talks down, speaks in a raised tone, uses words and language or makes gestures that aim to lower the dignity and demonstrate disrespect, it shall be considered an intentional insult.

Intentional interruption - When a person interjects during an address by the chairperson of a judicial proceeding with the intention of disrupting the flow, not letting the other person complete or to speak above what is being addressed, it shall be considered an intentional interruption.

The person performing the other actions need not be a person charged or convicted of a crime. When any person present during a judicial proceeding commits any of the above actions, he or she shall be considered an offender under the provisions of Section 267.

Punishment

Any person who deliberately insults or interrupts a public officer presiding over a judicial proceeding shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.

The above actions may not be an offence under this section if:

  • The insult or interruption was not unintended.
  • The offender is forced or coerced into performing such actions
  • The offender is a minor or not of sane mind at the time of performing such actions
  • The act was done outside of a judicial proceeding not during the course of it.

  • However, there may be other sections under the BNS under which the above actions can be prosecuted and while they may be disqualified under the provisions of this section, such actions will still be punishable under the provisions of those respective sections of the BNS.

    Illustration

    A is a person charged with public nuisance. In the course of the proceeding, the judge addresses the accused, informing him how his actions are setting the wrong example for the younger generation. The man tells the judge to mind his own business. A is an offender under section 267.

    Disclaimer:

    The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

    Key Points of BNS 267

    This section deals with: Interrupting or insulting presiding judge

    Description of offence:

  • Any person who unduly and intentionally interrupts or intentionally insults any judge or magistrate presiding over any judicial matter shall be considered an offender under this section.

  • Punishment for offence:
  • Any person found guilty under this section shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.

  • Exceptions to offence:
  • The offender has been coerced into committing the offence
  • The person is a minor or not of sane mind
    1. Differences Between Section 267 of BNS and its equivalent IPC section

      The BNS came into force on July 1, 2024, effectively replacing the Indian Penal Code. Section 267 of BNS replaces Section 228 of the IPC. Let us look at the changes that have been made in the provisions of the new section in comparison to the old one.

      BNS Sections/Subsections Subject IPC Sections Summary of Comparison
      267 Intentional insult or interruption to public servant sitting in judicial proceeding. 228 Upper limit of fine is increased from one thousand to five thousand rupees.

      Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

      Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

      • Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
      • Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
      • Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
      • Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

      FAQs about Section 267 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

      Unless the interruptions or insults were unintentional, there are no exceptions to intentional interruptions or insults made to a presiding judge.
      Any person who unduly and intentionally interrupts or intentionally insults any judge or magistrate presiding over any judicial matter shall be considered an offender under this section.
      Yes. Offence under Section 267 is a bailable offence.
      Any individual who accidentally interrupts a judicial proceeding must immediately acknowledge the accidental act and apologise to the presiding judge.
      Yes. If the presiding judge feels an action has caused interruption or insult to the authority of his position, then it shall constitute offence under Section 267.
      Yes. If the judge feels that an advocate is causing intentional delays to interrupt the proceedings, he or she may charge the advocate under Section 267.
       Section 267 of BNS

      footer-service

      By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service Cookie Policy Privacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

      Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

      Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.