Consult an Expert
Business Setup
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTax & Compliance
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backTrademark & IP
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backDocumentation
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backOthers
Prefer to talk to a business advisor first?
Book a call backConsult an Expert
Business Setup
Tax & Compliance
Trademark & IP
Documentation
Others
More
Consult an Expert
Business Setup
International Business Setup
Company Name Search
Licenses & Registrations
Web Development
Tax & Compliance
GST and Other Indirect Tax
Changes in Pvt Ltd Company
Changes In Limited Liability Partnership
Mandatory Annual Filings
Labour Compliance
Accounting & Tax
Trademark & IP
Trademark
Design Registration
Documentation
Free Legal Documents
Business Contracts
Personal & Family
Notices
HR Policies
Others
Calculator
NGO Registration
NGO Compliance
Licenses & Registrations
Name Change & Other Conditiions
File an e-FIR
Marriage
File a Consumer Complaint
Lawyer Services
Login
Section 260 falls under Chapter 14 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Chapter 14 covers offences of false evidence and offences against public justice. Each section under this chapter deals with different offences related to matters that obstruct the delivery of public justice. Section specifically deals with intentionally omitting duty. Let us take a closer look at its provisions.
Section 260 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 states:
“Whoever, being a public servant, legally bound as such public servant to apprehend or to keep in confinement any person under sentence of a Court for any offence or lawfully committed to custody, intentionally omits to apprehend such person, or intentionally suffers such person to escape or intentionally aids such person in escaping or attempting to escape from such confinement, shall be punished,—
(a) with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to fourteen years, with or without fine, if the person in confinement, or who ought to have been apprehended, is under sentence of death;
(b) with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, with or without fine, if the person in confinement or who ought to have been apprehended, is subject, by a sentence of a Court, or by virtue of a commutation of such sentence, to imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of ten years, or upwards; or
(c) with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both, if the person in confinement or who ought to have been apprehended, is subject by a sentence of a Court to imprisonment for a term not extending to ten years or if the person was lawfully committed to custody.”
This section is applicable to any person within the sovereign borders of India, whether citizen, resident or otherwise. It deals with the offence of public servant intentionally disregarding duty. Let us break down the section to get a better understanding of it.
Offence
There is a very specific class of public servants who are charged with the responsibility of apprehending and confining persons as per the directions of the law. Apprehension or confinement are usually directed towards persons who are considered dangerous to public safety and order. These are usually offenders or persons accused of an offence. Not only are they a potential threat to the public in general, but they are also persons who are looking to flee to avoid prosecution for their crimes. Such persons are capable of going to great lengths to avoid being apprehended. Hence, the task of apprehending and confining them is given to persons who are not only physically and mentally fit to deal with such an onerous task, but also possess the integrity to carry it out to the best of their capability.
This section specifically deals with public officials who bear the responsibility of apprehending and confining persons under sentence of a Court for any offence or lawfully committed to custody. Persons under sentence of a court are people who have been declared guilty by a court of law or have been committed to custody under the order of a court.
When the person responsible with apprehending and confining such persons is found to have intentionally omitted his or her duty, they shall be punishable under the provisions of this section. The section specifically lists out three acts that amount to omission of duty for the purposes of this section:
Disclaimer:
The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.
This section deals with: Intentional failure to apprehend a convict.
Description of offence:
The BNS came into force on July 1, 2024, effectively replacing the Indian Penal Code. Section 260 of BNS replaces Section 222 of the IPC. Let us look at the changes that have been made in the provisions of the new section in comparison to the old one.
BNS Sections/Subsections | Subject | IPC Sections | Summary of Comparison |
---|---|---|---|
260 | Intentional omission to apprehend on part of public servant bound to apprehend person under sentence or lawfully committed. | 222 | No change in provisions for offence. |
Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:
Talk To Experts
Calculators
Downloads
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service , Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy and Refund Policy © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.
Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.