Business Setup

Tax & Compliance

Trademark & IP

Documentation

Others

user-login
Consult an Expert

Consult an Expert

Right Arrow
Business Setup

Business Setup

Right Arrow
Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Right Arrow
Trademark & IP

Trademark & IP

Right Arrow
Documentation

Documentation

Right Arrow
Others

Others

Right Arrow
More

More

Right Arrow

Login

Section 255 falls under Chapter 14 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS). Chapter 14 covers offences of false evidence and offences against public justice. Each section under this chapter deals with different offences related to matters that obstruct the delivery of public justice. Section 255 specifically deals with obstruction of justice by public servant. Let us take a closer look at its provisions.

Definition of BNS Section 255

Section 255 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 states:

“Whoever, being a public servant, knowingly disobeys any direction of the law as to the way in which he is to conduct himself as such public servant, intending thereby to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment, or subject him to a less punishment than that to which he is liable, or with intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture or any charge to which it is liable by law, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.”

Explanation and Illustration of Section 255

This section is applicable to any public servant in the employ of any organisation or body under the Government of India, whether citizen, resident or otherwise. It deals with the offence of obstruction of justice by public servant. Let us break down the section to get a better understanding of it.

Offence

The duties and responsibilities of a public servant are well defined under various legislations. There is a legislation for central government employees (e.g., Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964), separate one for state government employees (e.g., Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973) and employees of public sector units have their own handbook (e.g., Securities And Exchange Board Of India (Employees' Service) Regulations, 2001). Apart from these, the public servant is also bound by any orders or notifications passed by their higher authorities, such as a court or a committee, as mandated from time to time. These legislations and the orders from the authorised authorities are what this section defines as “direction of the law”.

When a public servant disobeys any direction of the law for any of the following intentions, it shall be an offence under the provisions of section 255:

Intent to save, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby save, any person from legal punishment: This refers to a public servant performing any action deviating from the direction of the law in order to save a person from legal punishment. When the action does not directly lead to protecting an offender but indirectly shields any offender from punishment, then such an indirect action is said to have been performed knowing it to be likely that it will thereby save the offender.

Intent to subject to a less punishment than that to which he is liable: This refers to a public servant performing any action deviating from the direction of the law in order to reduce the culpability and punishment of an offender as against the punishment they ought to have undergone rightfully.

Intent to save, or knowing that he is likely thereby to save, any property from forfeiture: This refers to a public servant performing any action deviating from the direction of the law in order to save a person’s property from being lawfully forfeited. A person’s property is usually lawfully forfeited when they have defaulted government dues, taxes or fines or as a result of a court order. When the action does not directly lead to protecting such property but indirectly shields any offender’s property from forfeiture, then such an indirect action is said to have been performed knowing it to be likely that it will thereby save the property.

Intent to save from any charge to which it is liable by law: This refers to a public servant performing any action deviating from the direction of the law in order to save someone from being charged with any offence under the Indian law.

Punishment
Any public servant who deviates from direction of the law with the intent to do any of the above, he or she shall be punishable under the provisions of Section 255 with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

The above actions may not be an offence under this section if:

  • The public servant in question is forced or coerced into disobeying the direction of the law and protecting an offender.

  • Illustration

    A, an IAS officer, learns that his son has been caught driving a vehicle without a license. A, using his influence, ensures that the incident is not reported and his son is let go scot free. A is an offender under the provisions of Section 255.

    Disclaimer:

    The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

    Key Points of BNS 255

    This section deals with: Public servant disobeying directions to prevent punishment or seizure.

    Description of offence:

  • Any public servant who disobeys directions of the law in order to protect any person from lawful punishment or any property from lawful seizure shall be considered an offender under this section.

  • Punishment for offence:
  • Any person found guilty under this section shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both

  • Exceptions to offence:
  • The offender has been coerced into committing the offence
  • The person is a minor or not of sane mind
    1. Differences Between Section 255 of BNS and its equivalent IPC section

      The BNS came into force on July 1, 2024, effectively replacing the Indian Penal Code. Section 255 of BNS replaces Section 217 of the IPC.Let us look at the changes that have been made in the provisions of the new section in comparison to the old one.

      BNS Sections/Subsections Subject IPC Sections Summary of Comparison
      255 Public servant disobeying direction of law with intent to save person from punishment or property from forfeiture. 217 No change in provisions for offence.

      Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

      Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

      • Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
      • Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
      • Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
      • Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

      FAQs about Section 255 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS)

      Any public servant who disobeys directions of the law in order to protect any person from lawful punishment or any property from lawful seizure shall be considered an offender under section 255.
      Any person found guilty under this section shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both
      Yes. Given that public servants do enjoy certain discretionary powers, by penalising public servants who use such powers to unlawfully protect persons from punishment or property from seizure, Section 255 deters the misuse of such powers.
      Yes. Any public servant who omits to use his legal powers to prevent and arrest crime shall be considered to be protecting criminal elements from punishment and hence draws the provisions of Section 255.
      By penalising those who use their legal immunity to protect illegal and criminal elements, Section 255 addressed misuse of such privilege.
      By penalising public servants who protect illegal and criminal elements, Section 255 deters corruption in public service.
       Section 255 of BNS

      footer-service

      By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service Cookie Policy Privacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

      Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

      Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.