Business Registration

Tax & Compliance

Trademark & IP

Documentation

Others

user-login
Consult an Expert

Consult an Expert

Right Arrow
Business Registration

Business Registration

Right Arrow
Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Right Arrow
Trademark & IP

Trademark & IP

Right Arrow
Documentation

Documentation

Right Arrow
Others

Others

Right Arrow
More

More

Right Arrow

Login

Section 247 falls under Chapter 14 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Chapter 14 covers offences of false evidence and offences against public justice. Each section under this chapter deals with different offences related to matters that obstruct the delivery of public justice. Section 247 specifically deals with false cases. Let us take a closer look at its provisions.

Definition of BNS Section 247

Section 247 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 states:

“Whoever fraudulently obtains a decree or order against any person for a sum not due, or for a larger sum than is due or for any property or interest in property to which he is not entitled, or fraudulently causes a decree or order to be executed against any person after it has been satisfied or for anything in respect of which it has been satisfied, or fraudulently suffers or permits any such act to be done in his name, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.”

Explanation and Illustration of Section 247

This section is applicable to any person within the sovereign borders of India, whether citizen, resident or otherwise. It deals with the offence of filing a false case. Let us break down the section to get a better understanding of it.

Offence

This section is supplementary to Section 245. As per section 245, if a person asks another person to file a fake case against himself or herself for any fraudulent means or ends, then it shall be considered an offence under the provisions of this section. Section 247 states that a person who files a false case at the behest of another person shall be considered an offender.

In simple words, if a person asks another person to file a false against himself with the intention to commit fraud, and the other person actually files the false case in collusion with that person, the person who asks another person to file a false case is punished under Section 245, while the person who actually files the false case is punished under Section 247.

A person may want to have a case filed against themselves for many fraudulent reasons. Some examples are:

  • To avoid paying money owed to someone else
  • To make an insurance claim against such losses for which there may be a policy
  • To show losses in finances or feign bankruptcy to avoid paying taxes
  • To avoid seizure of property by the government

  • This section gives specific illustrations of the kind of fake cases that may be filed that count as an offence:

  • A case for a sum not due: This refers to filing a fake case for an amount that was never owed or for an amount that is not yet due.
  • A case for a larger sum than is due: This refers to filing a fake case by inflating the amount that is due by either charging exorbitant interest or penalty or inflating the original principal sum.
  • A case for any property: This refers to filing a fake case for settlement of debt by seizing a property
  • A case for interest in property to which such person is not entitled: This refers to filing a fraudulent case to stake claim to a property to which there is no legal entitlement; neither by birthright nor any agreement nor under any law.
  • A case for an issue or a claim has been satisfied: This refers to filing a case to claim a debt that has already been satisfied by falsely stating that the debt has not yet been satisfied.

  • However, there is one very important qualifying factor that must be taken into consideration before such an act can be considered an offence. There person must obtain a decree or order from the court. In other words, merely filing a case is not enough. There has to actually be a judgement or decree ordering the payment of the false dues or the execution and seizure of the contentious property.

    Punishment

    If any of the above actions are performed and an order or decree is passed to that extent, then such an action shall be prosecuted under the provisions of section 247 and if found guilty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

    The above actions may not be an offence under this section if:

  • If the case is filed for a genuine amount and is rightfully due even though the intention is to avoid paying to another party.
  • If the court or competent authority does not pass a decree

  • Illustration

    A files a case against Z for money owed. Z, knowing that A is likely to win the case and obtain a court order against him, approaches B. B, who actually has no claims against Z, files a fake claim for compensation against Z on Z’s insistence. Z does not contest B’s charges and accepts B’s claim causing the court to pass an order against Z. Later Z settles the matter with B by paying him a small amount as remuneration for filing the false case and Z avoids paying A by claiming that he became bankrupt after settling B’s case. Z has committed an offence under section 245. B has committed an offence under section 247.

    Disclaimer: The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

    Key Points of BNS 247

    This section deals with: Making false or fictitious claims against debt not due.

    Description of offence:

  • Any person who files false claims against any other person for false, undue or inflated debts for fraudulent or dishonest purposes shall be considered an offender under this section.

  • Punishment for offence:
  • Any person found guilty under this section shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

  • Exceptions to offence:
  • The offender has been coerced into committing the offence.
  • The person is a minor or not of sane mind.
    1. Differences Between Section 247 of BNS and its equivalent IPC section

      The BNS came into force on July 1, 2024, effectively replacing the Indian Penal Code. Section 247 of BNS replaces Section 208 of the IPC. Let us look at the changes that have been made in the provisions of the new section in comparison to the old one.

      BNS Sections/Subsections SubjectIPC Sections Summary of Comparison
      245 Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due. 208 No change.

      Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

      Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

      • Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
      • Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
      • Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
      • Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

      FAQs about Section 247 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS)

      When a person makes any false claims against any other person for money owed, when such amount is not owed, or not due or is more than what is actually due, and does so with dishonest intentions is considered to be committing fraudulent acts under Section 247.
      Any person found guilty under this section shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
      Any person falsely accused under Section 247 should provide evidence to prove that the claims made are not false and have not been made for any fraudulent purposes.
      Yes. Section 247 applies to any fraudulent claims made against any person, irrespective of whether the claim has been online or not.
      By penalising any false payment claims, Section 247 ensures that the mechanism for curt order payments remains accountable and effective.
      Yes. By penalising any false payment claims, Section 247 discourages misuse of judicial system.
      Any evidence presented to support a false claim shall be considered fraudulent under Section 247.
      Any victim of a fraudulent decree can challenge it by providing evidence of such claim being false in a court of law.
       Section 247 of BNS

      footer-service

      By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service Cookie Policy Privacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

      Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

      Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.

      earn

      Refer a friend