Business Setup

Tax & Compliance

Trademark & IP

Documentation

Others

user-login
Consult an Expert

Consult an Expert

Right Arrow
Business Setup

Business Setup

Right Arrow
Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Right Arrow
Trademark & IP

Trademark & IP

Right Arrow
Documentation

Documentation

Right Arrow
Others

Others

Right Arrow
More

More

Right Arrow

Login

Section 243 falls under Chapter 14 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Chapter 14 covers offences of false evidence and offences against public justice. Each section under this chapter deals with different offences related to matters that obstruct the delivery of public justice. Section 243 specifically deals with obstructing lawful seizure of property. Let us take a closer look at its provisions.

Definition of BNS Section 243

Section 243 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 states:

“Whoever fraudulently removes, conceals, transfers or delivers to any person any property or any interest therein, intending thereby to prevent that property or interest therein from being taken as a forfeiture or in satisfaction of a fine, under a sentence which has been pronounced, or which he knows to be likely to be pronounced, by a Court or other competent authority, or from being taken in execution of a decree or order which has been made, or which he knows to be likely to be made by a Court in a civil suit, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.”

Explanation and Illustration of BNS Section 243

This section is applicable to any person within the sovereign borders of India, whether citizen, resident or otherwise. It deals with the offence of obstructing lawful seizure of property. Let us break down the section to get a better understanding of it.

Offence

To simplify what has been in the section, any person who tries to obstruct the lawful seizure of a property by government officials shall be considered an offender under the provisions of this section. The section lists the following activities as obstruction to lawful seizure:

  • Removal: This refers to the act of removing a property from its usual or rightful place in order to prevent its seizure.
  • Concealment: This refers to the act of hiding or secreting a property in a secret location in order to prevent its seizure.
  • Transferring or delivering: This not only refers to physically transferring or delivering a property to someone else but also refers to transferring or delivering interest. This means transferring or delivering the ownership rights of that property in someone else’s name so as to prevent its seizure.

  • Further, the section also clarifies that the timing of performing the above defined actions is irrelevant. It says that the actions above will be an offence if they are performed to prevent seizure under either of the following circumstances:

  • a sentence which has been pronounced - meaning the above defined actions took place after the sentence was passed.
  • knows to be likely to be pronounced - meaning that the person has preempted the passing of such order or sentence and has performed such action even before the order or sentence is passed.


  • Obstruction from seizure of property in either circumstance shall be considered as an offence as long as they meet the following criteria.

  • The seizure has been made in as a forfeiture - This happens when a property is deemed illegal or its possession has been deemed illegal by the court or a competent authority.
  • The seizure has been made in in satisfaction of a fine: This happens when a person has been fined for any offence under the law and the person has abstained from or is unable to pay the fine. The authorities in this case may direct authorised personnel to seize property in settlement of the fine.
  • The seizure has been made in execution of a decree in a civil suit: This happens when a person has lost a case in the civil court and the judge has ordered the seizure of the property as part of the judgement. This can refer to cases of non-settlement of business or personal debts, property or family disputes etc. If the judgement has ordered the seizure of a property in the course of such cases, then obstructing the seizure shall amount to an offence under this section.
  • The seizure has been authorised by court or other competent authority: The seizure has to be made under a sentence which has been pronounced, or which he knows to be likely to be pronounced, by a Court or other competent authority, such as an Income Tax Commissioner or a District magistrate. In other words, unless the person making the seizure has the authority or has been empowered by an order from a person who has the authority to make such seizures, the seizure cannot be made. If made, it is illegal.

  • Punishment

    If any of the above mentioned actions meet the above mentioned criteria, they shall be prosecuted under the provisions of this section and if found guilty, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.

    The above actions may not be an offence under this section if:
  • The offender removed or transferred the property did not know that such an order for seizure has been passed or is likely to be passed.
  • The person making the seizure does not have the authority or an authorised order to make such seizure

  • Illustration

    X, who has not paid the dues on a loan he took for his car. The court order seizure of the car. He hides the car in a secret location and claims it has been stolen and hence cannot be possessed. X is an offender under Section 243.

    Z who plans on evading payment of certain taxes transfers all his properties in the name of his cousin brother so that when the tax authorities try to seize his properties, they will be able to take them. The income tax authorities eventually find out and send him a notice. They send someone to seize the properties and find out what he has done. Z is prosecuted for the crime of tax evasion, as well as obstruction of lawful seizure of property under the provisions of Section 243.

    Disclaimer:

    The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

    Key Points of BNS 243

    This section deals with: Concealing property to avoid seizure.

    Description of offence:

  • Any person found guilty of concealing property that he knows is bound to be seized by any government authority shall be considered an offender under this section.

  • Punishment for offence:
  • Any person found guilty under this section shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.

  • Exceptions to offence:
  • The offender has been coerced into committing the offence
  • The person is a minor or not of sane mind
    1. Differences Between Section 243 of BNS and its equivalent IPC section

      The BNS came into force on July 1, 2024, effectively replacing the Indian Penal Code.Section 243 of BNS replaces IPC Section 206. Let us look at the changes that have been made in the provisions of the new section in comparison to the old one.

      BNS Sections/Subsections Subject IPC Sections Summary of Comparison
      243 Fraudulent removal or concealment of property to prevent its seizure as forfeited or in execution.206 The upper limit of imprisonment has been increased from two years to three years. The IPC section did not specify the amount of the fine. The BNS section specifically defines the fine up to five thousand rupees.

      Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

      Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

      • Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
      • Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
      • Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
      • Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

      FAQs about Section 243 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

      Yes. Any order or action performed by any government servant can be challenged as long as it is done through legally prescribed channels and redressal forums. Challenging the authority of the law in any other manner is a punishable offence.
      Yes. There are situations or circumstances when a property is seized and sold to satisfy a judicial order. However, the order has to be passed by someone who has officially been authorised by the government and the sale has to be carried out as per the procedure laid down within the legal framework.
      Yes. A public servant is required to present an order or warrant at the time of seizing any property for sale. Failure to do so makes the seizure illegal.
      In order to retrieve seized property, one must challenge the seizure through legally prescribed channels and redressal forums. Challenging the authority of the law in any other manner is a punishable offence.
      In order to stop the government from selling your property, one must challenge the seizure of the property through legally prescribed channels and redressal forums. Challenging the authority of the law in any other manner is a punishable offence.
       Section 243 of BNS

      footer-service

      By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service Cookie Policy Privacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

      Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

      Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.