Business Setup

Tax & Compliance

Trademark & IP

Documentation

Others

user-login
Consult an Expert

Consult an Expert

Right Arrow
Business Setup

Business Setup

Right Arrow
Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Right Arrow
Trademark & IP

Trademark & IP

Right Arrow
Documentation

Documentation

Right Arrow
Others

Others

Right Arrow
More

More

Right Arrow

Login

Section 213 falls under Chapter 13 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Chapter 13 covers offences of contempt of the lawful authority of public servants. Each section under this chapter deals with different offences related to disobeying the authority exercised by a public servant in performance of his or her duty. Section 213 specifically deals with the offence of disobeying order of a public servant in the performance of duty. Let us take a closer look at its provisions.

Definition of BNS Section 213

Section 213 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 states:
“Whoever refuses to bind himself by an oath or affirmation to state the truth, when required so to bind himself by a public servant legally competent to require that he shall so bind himself, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.”

Explanation and Illustration of BNS Section 213

This section deals with disobeying or refusing to cooperate with a public servant in performance of his duty. Let us break down this section to understand it better:

This section is applicable to any person within the sovereign borders of India, whether citizen, resident or otherwise. It deals with the act of refusing to bind oneself by an oath or affirmation to state the truth.

Sometimes during the course of a proceeding or an enquiry, when a public servant records a statement from a person for the purpose of such proceeding or enquiry and does not have the means to determine if the statement is true or not. In such circumstances, the public servant may require the person making the statement to bind themselves to their statement by taking an oath with regard to the correctness of the statement. It may be done by way of having them place their hand on a book or scripture that he or she may hold sacred or by way of making them sign an affidavit.

If the person who is being asked to take the oath refuses to do so, it amounts to an offence under the provisions of Section 213. However, there are two qualifications that such an act needs to meet in order to be an offence under this section.

  • He must be required to bind himself to do so. A person is legally obligated to speak the truth when a public servant is making enquiries in the performance of their duty. Refusing to do so, omitting to do so or doing so falsely is an abject violation of the law.
  • The officer demanding the taking of the oath must be authorised to administer the oath. Not all government servants have the authority to administer the oath of truth. So even if the public servant may have the authority to make enquiries, they may be required to go to the appropriate authority to administer the oath. If an officer not authorised to do so makes a person take an oath, such oath is invalid and has no value in a court of law.

  • If the above two conditions are met and the person still refuses to take the oath, then he or she shall be punishable with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.

    Disclaimer: The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

    Key Points in BNS Section 213

    This section deals with: Refusing to take an oath as per the law.

    Description of offence:

  • Any person who is asked to take an oath or affirmation as and when required by the law shall be considered an offender under this section.

  • Punishment for offence:
  • Any person found guilty under this section shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.

  • Exceptions to offence:
  • The offender has been coerced into committing the offence
  • The person is a minor or not of sane mind
    1. Differences Between Section 213 of BNS and its Equivalent IPC Section

      The BNS came into force on July 1, 2024, effectively replacing the Indian Penal Code. Section 213 of BNS replaces IPC Section 178. Let us look at the changes that have been made in the provisions of the new section in comparison to the old one.

      BNS Sections/SubsectionsSubjectIPC SectionsSummary of Comparison
      213Refusing oath or affirmation when duly required by public servant to make it. 178 Upper limit of fine is increased from one thousand to five thousand rupees.

      Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

      Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

      • Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
      • Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
      • Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
      • Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

      FAQs about Section 213 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

      In India, to swear an oath in court, a witness typically says, "I, do swear in the name of God that the evidence I shall give to the court shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God.". This is based on the Indian Oaths Act, 1873, and allows individuals who have no objection to taking an oath to do so by invoking God.
      Yes, an affidavit is essentially a written statement made under oath, meaning it is considered legally equivalent to taking an oath; the person signing the affidavit is swearing to the truthfulness of the information contained within it, making it a form of oath on paper.
      No. Refusing to be bound by an oath towards statement of truth is an offence under section 213 and is punishable with imprisonment and a possibility of fine.
      Lying in an affidavit is a punishable offence. However, the punishment depends on the severity of the oath and the authority to whom the oath has been administered. If an affidavit with a false statement is submitted in response to a query by a government employee, then it is punishable under the provisions of section 213 of the BNS.
      Yes. In most legal systems, you can refuse to take an oath on grounds of a sincere religious objection, meaning if your faith prohibits swearing an oath, you can refuse to swear on god. You will, however, be required to make a solemn affirmation instead, which carries the same legal weight but avoids the religious element.
       Section 213 of BNS

      footer-service

      By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service Cookie Policy Privacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

      Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

      Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.