Business Setup

Tax & Compliance

Trademark & IP

Documentation

Others

user-login
Consult an Expert

Consult an Expert

Right Arrow
Business Setup

Business Setup

Right Arrow
Tax & Compliance

Tax & Compliance

Right Arrow
Trademark & IP

Trademark & IP

Right Arrow
Documentation

Documentation

Right Arrow
Others

Others

Right Arrow
More

More

Right Arrow

Login

Section 165 of BNS is part of Chapter 8 - Offences relating to the army, navy and air force in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Act. It addresses the issue of military deserters concealed on board merchant vessels due to the negligence of the ship’s master. This provision focuses on holding accountable those in charge of merchant vessels who fail to prevent deserters from boarding and hiding.

Definition of BNS Section 165

Section 165 of the BNS 2023 States:
The master or person in charge of a merchant vessel, on board of which any deserter from the Army, Navy or Air Force of the Government of India is concealed, shall, though ignorant of such concealment, be liable to a penalty not exceeding three thousand rupees, if he might have known of such concealment but for some neglect of his duty as such master or person in charge, or but for some want of discipline on board of the vessel.

Explanation and Illustration of BNS Section 165

The section highlights the responsibilities of shipmasters so that their ships will not be a means of dodging military authorities or assisting the deserters since it can bring about interference with military operations and also compromise security. In a case where the master fails to prevent the act of desertion by allowing the military deserter to board or hide without due inspection, then the master might be liable for not preventing the desertion act.

  • Example:
    If a naval man deserts duty and flees to some foreign merchant vessel to seek refuge therein, it's the obligation of the master to examine that merchant vessel with full care to prevent harboring of that desertion. If the master fails to do that either by failing to inspect the ship properly or not reporting the deserter to be on board, then it will be subject to Section 165.
    This is to discourage negligence and the concept of inadvertently employing merchant vessels in desertion cases. Outside of the military perimeter, there is still a need to have military discipline and accountability.

Disclaimer: The examples provided are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. They should not be used for legal proceedings or decision-making. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified legal professional.

Key Points in Section 165

This is only applicable to the person-incharge of the merchant vessel only, as individuals responsible for occurrences happening on a vessel are particularly concerned with concealing military deserters. The master can even be held liable where such master is said to have charged constructive notice to hide the said deserter. The liability may also arise when such concealment can be attributed to his neglect or lack of performance of duty:

  • Neglect of Duty: Failure to perform expected duties by a master or one in charge of the vessel
  • Lack of Discipline: Inadequate management or order on board; the ship that allows such to be undetected

  • Thus, the act of this neglect is put into a military context. This offense warrants a punishment amounting to the maximum of fine up to ₹3000. The Act, in making military discipline undesirable for harbouring deserters, motivates the duties by those in charge of the transport vessels.

      Differences Between Section 165 of BNS and its Equivalent IPC Section

      This section outlines the key differences between Section 165 of BNS and its equivalent IPC section 137 focusing on their distinct approaches to definitions, interpretations and legal principles within the framework of criminal law.

      BNS Sections/ SubsectionsSubject IPC Sections Summary of comparison
      165 Deserter concealed on board, of master merchant vessel through negligence. 137 Upper limit of fine is increased from five hundred to three thousand rupees.

      Why Choose Vakilsearch for Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)?

      Understanding the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) laws can be confusing, but Vakilsearch is here to make it easy for you. Here’s why we’re the right choice:

      • Expert Help: Our lawyers know the BNS sections inside out and can guide you through how the new laws apply to you or your business.
      • Simple and Clear: We break down all the legal jargons into simple language, so you can easily understand what steps to take.
      • Personalised Service: Whether you need help with specific BNS sections for women or other legal concerns, we provide advice and support tailored to your situation.
      • Experienced Team: We’ve helped thousands of clients understand about the old IPC sections, and now we’re ready to help you transition smoothly to the new BNS laws.

      FAQs about Section 165 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)

      A lack of discipline aboard the vessel may lead to a situation where a military deserter is concealed without the master’s knowledge.
      The penalty for violating Section 165 is a fine not exceeding ₹3000. This penalty underscores the seriousness of failing to prevent the concealment of military deserters and the responsibility of the vessel’s master to ensure discipline.
      Section 165 plays a crucial role in upholding military discipline by deterring the harboring of deserters. It reinforces the responsibility of shipmasters to prevent the concealment of individuals subject to military law and maintain proper order on their vessels.
      No, section 165 specifically applies to merchant vessels. The law does not extend to private ships or other types of vessels, focusing on those used for trade and transportation that could be used to conceal military deserters.
      Even if the master is unaware of the deserter’s presence, they can still be held liable under Section 165 if they could have reasonably discovered it. Failure to notice such concealment due to neglect or lack of discipline can result in legal consequences.
      A master may defend themselves by demonstrating that they took all reasonable measures to prevent the concealment of a military deserter. However, if the defense cannot establish this, they may still be held liable under the provisions of Section 165.
      Section 165 aligns with other provisions in the BNS by ensuring the enforcement of military discipline. It complements laws that regulate desertion, military offenses, and the responsibilities of individuals in charge of transport vessels, ensuring desertion is prevented and punished.
       section 165 of bns

      footer-service

      By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service Cookie Policy Privacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

      Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

      Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.