In India, the Indian Penal Code and the Constitution of India, protect women against sexual harassment in the workplace and also in public places. Read on to know if sexually Provocative Dress can dilute a sexual harassment case.
Sexual harassment is a serious issue that affects women in India and around the world. It can take many forms, from verbal abuse to physical assault, and it can have a profound impact on a woman’s mental and physical well-being. In recent years, there has been a growing debate in India about whether a woman’s Sexually Provocative Dress can play a role in sexual harassment cases.
Some argue that a woman who chooses to wear a sexually provocative dress may be inviting unwanted attention or even asking for it. They suggest that this could dilute a sexual harassment case, making it harder for a woman to seek justice. Let’s see if the victim’s clothing can actually dilute the case of sexual harassment.
The Kerala Case
The Kozhikode Sessions Court in Kerala recently ruled that a sexual harassment complaint may be weakened if the complainant was dressed in a sexually provocative manner. The case involved an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in which the complainant alleged that the accused had caught her hand, taken her to a secluded area, and touched her breast in an attempt to outrage her modesty at Nandi Beach.
As a result, an FIR was filed under Section 354A (2) (sexual harassment and punishment), Section 341 (punishment for wrongful restraint), and Section 354 (assault of criminal force to outrage the modesty of women) of the Indian Penal Code.
The Sessions Court expressed doubt that the 74-year-old physically disabled accused could have physically forced the complainant onto his lap and sexually assaulted her. The court noted that for an act to be considered as outraging the modesty of a woman under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, there must be intention on the part of the accused.
Additionally, for an act to fall under Section 354A, which deals with sexual harassment and its punishments, there must be physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures, explicit remarks, etc.
The court also noted that there was a long delay in lodging the FIR, two years after the alleged crime and that the photographs produced by the accused showed the complainant wearing sexually provocative clothing.
Public Response To the Statement of Court
The Kerala sexual harassment case refers to a legal case in which a court in the Indian state of Kerala ruled that the victim was wearing a “sexually provocative” dress, and therefore partially responsible for the harassment she experienced. The case has sparked widespread outrage and condemnation, with many people arguing that the court’s ruling is deeply flawed and perpetuates harmful stereotypes about victims of sexual assault.
One of the main criticisms of the court’s ruling is that it places blame on the victim, rather than the perpetrator, for the harassment. This is a common tactic used to excuse or justify sexual assault, and it is deeply harmful to survivors. It suggests that they are somehow responsible for the actions of their attacker and that they could have prevented the assault by behaving differently.
The Kerala sexual harassment case is a tragic reminder of the deep-seated biases and stereotypes that continue to plague the Indian legal system. The court’s ruling that the victim was wearing a “sexually provocative” dress and therefore partially responsible for the harassment she experienced is a clear example of this problem. It is imperative that the legal system takes a more compassionate and understanding approach to sexual harassment cases, one that places the blame firmly on the perpetrator and not the victim.
Indian Laws Regarding Sexual Harassment
The Indian Penal Code (IPC) provides for the punishment of sexual harassment under Section 354A. This section defines sexual harassment as any physical, verbal, or non-verbal conduct of a sexual nature that is unwelcome, and that could reasonably be expected to create an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment. This includes physical contact, gestures, comments, and showing pornography. The punishment for sexual harassment under this section is imprisonment for a term of up to three years, a fine, or both.
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act 2012 was enacted to protect children from sexual abuse and exploitation. This Act defines a child as any person below the age of 18 years and provides for stringent punishment for sexual offenses against children. The punishment for sexual offenses under this Act ranges from a minimum of 10 years imprisonment to life imprisonment.
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, commonly known as the POSH Act, is a law that deals specifically with sexual harassment of women in the workplace. This Act applies to all workplaces, including government and private offices, factories, and shops. It provides for the constitution of an internal committee at the workplace to investigate complaints of sexual harassment and also makes it mandatory for organizations to have a policy against sexual harassment in place.
In addition to these laws, the Indian government has also introduced several measures to address sexual harassment. These include the launch of a national helpline for women in distress, the setting up of fast-track courts to deal with cases of sexual assault, and the introduction of a bill to make stalking a non-bailable offense.
Conclusion
India has several laws in place to address sexual harassment and provide protection to the victims. But it is important to ensure that these laws are implemented and enforced. It is also important for individuals and organisations to create a safe and secure environment for women by following the laws and policies against sexual harassment.
In the Kerala case, the major problem with the court’s ruling is that it perpetuates the stereotype that a woman’s clothing is a sign of her sexual availability or consent. It suggests that women are responsible for controlling the actions of men and that they are only to blame if they do not dress appropriately.
Read more:
