Joint ventures (JVs) are strategic alliances between two or more businesses that enable them to work together and take advantage of one another's advantages. A JV's shareholding structure is an important consideration that calls for careful planning to ensure an equitable division of profits, control, and risks among the partners.
What is the Shareholding in a Joint Venture?
Shareholding in a joint venture refers to the venture’s ownership structure or the proportion of shares that each partner business owns. It establishes the venture’s ownership, financial viability, and hazards. Depending on the agreement between the partners, the sharing structure in a JV can be broken down into equity shares, preference shares, and other types of ownership. Let’s know how to strategise shareholding pattern in joint venture deal in this blog.
Shareholding Patterns in Joint Ventures
The strategising of shareholding pattern in joint venture deal can be structured in various ways, depending on the partners’ objectives and contributions. Some common shareholding patterns in JVs include:
Equal Shareholding: In this arrangement, each partner holds an equal portion of the company, often 50-50. It denotes an equal partnership with shared authority, rewards, and risks.
Majority-Minority Shareholding: According to this arrangement, one partner has a majority stake (more than 50%), and the other partner(s) own a stake in a lesser proportion. It comes with additional risks but also affords the majority partner a bigger profit share and more control over decision-making.
Differential Shareholding: Partners hold shares according to their individual contributions or areas of expertise in this way. One partner may own a larger proportion of the company’s shares, for instance, if they provide more finance, technology, or market access. It displays a strategic fit between the interests and strengths of the partners.
Dynamic Shareholding: In this pattern, partners’ shareholding changes over time based on performance or other agreed-upon criteria. For example, if one partner fails to meet its obligations, its shareholding may be reduced. It allows flexibility and incentivizes performance.
Strategising Shareholding Pattern in a JV
To strategise shareholding pattern in a JV requires careful consideration of various factors, such as partners’ objectives, contributions, risks, and exit strategies.
Here are some key tips for strategise shareholding pattern in a joint venture deal that are effective:
Understand Partners’ Objectives: Each partner may have different objectives, such as market entry, technology access, or profitability. Understanding partners’ long-term objectives helps in aligning shareholding patterns accordingly.
Evaluate Contributions: Assess each partner’s contributions, such as capital, technology, market access, and expertise. Partners making higher contributions may deserve a higher shareholding percentage.
Assess Risks: Evaluate the risks associated with the JV, such as market risks, regulatory risks, and operational risks. Partners willing to take higher risks may be rewarded with a higher shareholding percentage.
Consider Control: Shareholding determines the control in a JV, including decision-making power, board representation, and management roles. Partners seeking more control may negotiate for a higher shareholding percentage.
Plan for Exit Routes: Exit routes, such as buy-sell agreements, initial public offering (IPO), or liquidation, should be planned in advance. The shareholding pattern should consider the partners’ exit strategies to avoid conflicts in the future.
[/box]CCI Ruling in Joint Venture
To maintain fair competition and stop anti-competitive behaviours, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) is essential in the regulation of JVs. To assess whether a JV’s shareholding structure breaches antitrust rules, CCI may examine it. To prevent legal issues and penalties, it is crucial to adhere to CCI requirements and secure required approvals. To confirm that the shareholding structure in the JV complies with the relevant competition rules, partners should carefully analyse CCI guidelines and seek legal counsel.
Exit Routes in Joint Venture
Exit routes are critical considerations in a JV deal as they provide an exit strategy for partners in case of changing circumstances or business objectives. Common exit routes in a JV include:
Buy-Sell Agreements: Buy-sell agreements allow partners to buy or sell their shares in the JV under specified conditions, such as a change in control, breach of contract, or financial performance. It provides a mechanism for partners to exit or increase their shareholding in the JV.
Initial Public Offering (IPO): Partners may plan for an IPO as an exit route to go public and monetize their shareholding in the JV. It requires careful planning, regulatory compliance, and market conditions.
Liquidation: Liquidation involves winding up the JV and distributing the assets and proceeds among the partners. It may be an exit route in case of failure or dissolution of the JV, but it may not yield optimal returns.
Exit routes should be well-defined and agreed upon in the JV agreement to avoid conflicts and uncertainties in the future. It is essential to consider the legal, financial, and operational implications of each exit route and plan accordingly.
Read more,
