Appointment of Director Appointment of Director

How to Apply the 2013 Act’s Rules for a Director’s Stop by the Shareholder?

Keep reading if you want information on the director’s Stop.

Director Termination is a complex process in the corporate world. The board of directors represents the highest level of corporate governance. Accordingly, it is not unusual for corporate matters to be presented. Involving and centered on a minority of shareholders running for board seats to the advantage of a more significant minority of owners. A director’s position might be terminated for various reasons, including ineligibility to serve, a vacation of office, resignation, or removal.

Disagreements over the meaning of Section 169 (which is similar to Section 284 of the Companies Act, 1956) Le. Removal of a director, subject to specific criteria, in the Companies Act, 2013 (CA, 2013) has led to challenges to these provisions from shareholders. The courts, however, are constantly faced with the same, albeit intriguing, questions, such as whether or not the standards are exhaustive concerning the dismissal of a director. 

What does it mean if shareholders may vote out the board of directors? Is it possible for the board, within its purview, to dismiss a director without a vote of shareholders? To what extent another authority of removal supersedes the power of the board to dismiss directors (such as other directors, the nominator, or the like)

It is generally accepted that appointing authorities always retain the right to dismiss a director at any moment.

Shareholders have a say but aren’t the only ones who can stop a vote. This page details the steps required to remove a director and the legal justifications that can be used to do so.

Distribution of Power

Directors’ duties and shareholders’ rights should be complementary, not conflicting. In the CA, 2013, the roles, obligations, and ownership of shareholders and directors are all detailed. As the company’s agents, the directors have a fiduciary duty to the company’s shareholders and other stakeholders.

Because of their financial stake, shareholders might rightfully be called a company’s “owners.” Even though stockholders are the legal owners of a company, the board of directors is responsible for day-to-day operations and ensuring the company can remain in business as a going concern.

 It has increasingly been questioned how exceptional the right of shareholders to dismiss a director is. Removal of a director can be accomplished in one of four ways: by statute, by the articles of incorporation, by the terms of appointment, or by the terms of nomination. The shareholders can get rid of a director with a simple resolution if the Act’s Section 169 is followed. 

Shareholders can exercise this option if they believe a director acts in bad faith or is beyond their power. Shareholders are not obligated to offer explanations when they use their right to remove a director. Development of Legislation The statutes surrounding the removal of a director were initially proposed by the Cohen Committee. The UK Companies Act of 1948, developed by the Cohen Committee, was primarily based on the Companies Act 1929 (the primary statute controlling UK Company Law at the time).

Companies Act section 184 allows for the removal of a director in the event of poor performance. The same was true if shareholders needed approval through a regular resolution requiring special notice. The power to remove a director may exist apart from this section, and nothing in subsection (6) of section 184 shall be construed to deprive a person removed thereunder of compensation or damages payable to him in respect of the termination of his appointment as director or of any position terminating with that as director.

Companies Act 1985 and Companies Act 2006 both maintained the status quo. In some jurisdictions, legally removing a board of directors is possible. For instance, the Companies Act 71 of 2008 has a provision that, for the first time in South African law, grants the board of directors the power to remove a director from office.

History

If there are more than two directors in a company, and either a shareholder or a director believes that more than one of them is either (a) (i) ineligible or disqualified in terms of section 69, other than on the grounds contemplated in section 69(8)(a); or (ii) incapacitated to the extent that the director is unable to perform the functions of a director, and is unlikely to regain that capacity within a reasonable time, or (b) has neglected, or One more step in this direction is giving the board the power to fire its members.

 Section 168 of the UK Company Law addresses the issue of director removal. It states that a company may do so by ordinary resolution before a director’s term of office expires. Nothing in this section shall be construed as… derogating from any power to remove a director who may exist apart from this section, nor shall anything in this section be construed as adding to any such authority.

 A similar line of thinking has been employed in several judicial decisions. Specific provisions in the articles granting the option to “terminate the directorship forthwith… by notice in writing” to individual directors were valid.

Subject to the provisions of Article 84, the relevant company’s articles of association grant the Board full authority to act on behalf of the company. Article 85 gives the Board the authority to appoint from time to time any one or more of their number to be managing director, with such powers and authorities, for such period as they deem fit and to revoke such appointment.

Exiting Directors Who Voluntarily Resign

A member of the board who was having problems has resigned. For his resignation from the board of directors to take effect, the following steps will be taken:

  • The company will hold a Board Meeting with seven days’ notice if it receives information about the meeting 21 days in advance (this includes the day the message was sent and received).
  • The Board of Directors will have a special meeting to deliberate the resignation and make a decision.

A Board resolution in the following form will be adopted once the Board accepts the resignation:

  • It is now resolved that Mr. XYZ’s resignation will be accepted immediately.
  • “FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Board places on record its appreciation for the guidance and direction rendered by MR. XYZ during his service as Director of the Company.”
  • The resolution says, “RESOLVED FURTHER THAT directors of the Company be and are at this moment jointly empowered to execute all the acts, deeds, and things which are essential to the resignation of the abovementioned individual from the directorship of the Company.”
  • Director resignations require the submission of form DIR -11, the Board Resolution, proof of delivery of the resignation letter, and a copy of the resignation letter to the SEC within five business days of the adoption of the resolution.
  • When a director resigns, the company must submit a DIR-12 form to the Registrar of Companies, together with the director’s resignation letter and the board resolution, even though the director is responsible for completing their DIR-11 form.
  • After all the required paperwork has been provided, the director’s name will be removed from the Company’s master data on the Ministry of Corporate Affairs website.

Termination of Suo-Board moto’s Membership

Unless the Central Government or the Tribunal chooses the Director, the Company might dismiss them with an Ordinary Resolution.

  • At least seven days’ notice must be given to each director before a Board Meeting can be called. The director’s resignation will be communicated via a letter to the Board of Directors.
  • The resolution to dismiss the director and the answer to call an emergency general meeting will likely be approved at the same Board meeting.
  • The minimum amount of time needed to call a meeting of all shareholders is 21 days. At the next meeting, members will be asked to vote on the matter. Adopting a resolution requires a majority vote in its favour.
  • Before voting on the resolution, the director will be allowed to voice their concerns.
  • If the resolution succeeds, it will require a second submission of forms DIR-11 and DIR-12 along with the same attachments as the first filing of a Board Resolution, Ordinary Resolution.
  • After the necessary paperwork has been provided, the director’s name will be deleted from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs database.

If a Director misses three consecutive Board Meetings, they will be removed.

According to section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013, if a Director fails to attend a Board Meeting for 12 months beginning on the day he was absent from the first Board Meeting despite providing due notice for all the meetings, he is considered to have vacated the office. A Form DIR – 12 is filed on his name, and his name is removed from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

Conclusion

The preceding court decisions show that removing a director requires more than just following the procedures in section 169 of the Act. Nothing in this section shall limit a board of directors’ ability to remove a member of the board of directors of the company‘s articles of incorporation. Vakilsearch can help you if you need any guidance.

Also, Read:

About the Author

Akash Varadaraj, Executive Content Writer, specializes in creating engaging, SEO-driven content that enhances brand visibility. With over four years of experience, he crafts impactful blogs, articles, and marketing materials across industries like legal, tech, and business services. Akash excels in simplifying complex topics, building trust and credibility for his clients.

Subscribe to our newsletter blogs

Back to top button

👋 Don’t Go! Get a Free Consultation with our Expert to assist with Appointment of Director!

Enter your details to get started with professional assistance for Appointment of Director.

×


Adblocker

Remove Adblocker Extension