The NJAC was established with the aim of making the process of judicial appointments more transparent and accountable. The NJAC was also expected to reduce the delay in judicial appointments.
Supreme Court Collegium System
The Supreme Court Collegium System is a system for the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts of India. It is an informal body of five judges, headed by the Chief Justice of India, which recommends the names of judges to be appointed by the President of India. The government is bound to accept the recommendations of the Collegium, unless it has cogent reasons to reject them.
The Collegium System was evolved through a series of judgments of the Supreme Court, starting with the case of S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981). In this case, the Supreme Court held that the independence of the judiciary is essential for the rule of law, and that the executive government should not have a role in the appointment of judges. The Court also held that the judiciary is best equipped to assess the merits of candidates for judicial office.
The Collegium System has been criticized for its lack of transparency and accountability. It has also been alleged that the Collegium is dominated by certain castes and communities. However, the Collegium System has also been praised for its role in protecting the independence of the judiciary.
The National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) was a body that was established by the 99th Amendment to the Constitution of India in 2014. The NJAC was responsible for the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and the High Courts of India. It was composed of six members, including the Chief Justice of India, two other judges of the Supreme Court, two eminent persons nominated by the Central Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India, and the Union Minister of Law and Justice.
The NJAC was established with the aim of making the process of judicial appointments more transparent and accountable. It was also argued that the NJAC would reduce the executive government’s influence in the appointment of judges.
However, the NJAC was challenged in the Supreme Court of India. In 2015, the Supreme Court declared the NJAC unconstitutional. The Court held that the NJAC violated the principle of separation of powers, and that it gave the executive government too much power in the appointment of judges.
The Collegium System has been revived since the NJAC was struck down. However, the debate over the best system for the appointment of judges continues.
Arguments in favor of the Collegium System
- The Collegium System protects the independence of the judiciary.
- The judiciary is best equipped to assess the merits of candidates for judicial office.
- The Collegium System is based on the principle of peer review.
- The Collegium System has been in place for over 30 years and has worked well.
Arguments against the Collegium System
- The Collegium System is not transparent or accountable.
- The Collegium System is dominated by certain castes and communities.
- The Collegium System has led to delays in the appointment of judges.
- The Collegium System has led to the appointment of judges who are not qualified or competent.
Arguments in favor of the NJAC
- The NJAC would make the process of judicial appointments more transparent and accountable.
- The NJAC would reduce the executive government’s influence in the appointment of judges.
- The NJAC would ensure that judges are appointed on the basis of merit, and not on the basis of their caste or community.
Arguments against the NJAC
- The NJAC violates the principle of separation of powers.
- The NJAC gives the executive government too much power in the appointment of judges.
- The NJAC would undermine the independence of the judiciary.
Possible Reforms to the Collegium System
- The Collegium System could be made more transparent by requiring the Collegium to publish its reasons for recommending or rejecting candidates for judicial office.
- The Collegium System could be made more accountable by establishing a body that can review the Collegium’s decisions.
- The Collegium System could be made more inclusive by expanding the pool of candidates from which judges are appointed.
- The Collegium System could be made more efficient by streamlining the process of judicial appointments.
It is important to note that there is no perfect system for the appointment of judges. The best system is one that is tailored to the specific needs of each country.
Conclusion
The debate over the best system for the appointment of judges is likely to continue. The Collegium System has its advantages and disadvantages, as does the NJAC. Ultimately, the best system is one that protects the independence of the judiciary and ensures that judges are appointed on the basis of merit.
Also, Read:
