1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Vimalaben vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|21 June, 2012
In view of the fact that the nomination which has been made in the service records by Late Shri Manugiri Goswami is contrary to Rule 82 to 85 of the Gujarat Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 2002, it shall not be appropriate to allow the respondent to make any further payment to the nominated person. It is clarified that the amount which is already paid shall be subject to the final outcome of the petition.
The amount which is remaining to be paid shall be invested in a fixed deposit with a nationalised bank initially for a period of three years and on maturity shall be renewed by one year at a time without any further orders in this regard till the disposal of the petition.
The interest accruing on the said deposit shall continue to accrue and shall not be paid to anyone till the final decision is arrived at by this Court in the present petition.
JHAVERI, J.) Divya// Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.