Vadodara vs State

The present application has been filed by the applicant-orig.complainant for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 as per the order passed in Criminal Misc.Application No. 127 of 2010 dated 16.2.2010.

It is stated by learned advocate Mr.Majmudar that the order has been implemented and effected and the application for regular bail filed by the present applicant has also been allowed. This fact is also confirmed as per the affidavit in reply filed by respondent No.2 on page 97, stating that the regular bail has also been granted.

In view of the above, this application has become infructuous and accordingly it stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged.

The aforesaid order is passed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties as the order is passed without considering the merits only on the ground that it has become infructuous.

(Rajesh H.Shukla, J.) Sreeram.

Top