Tarangbhai Navnitbhai Patel & vs State Of Gujarat & 3

Rule returnable forthwith. Ms.Monali Bhatt, learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent -State.

Mr.P.N.Patel, Police Inspector, Kamrej Police Station is present before this Court. He has though not recorded any additional statement of first informant, he has recorded the statement of the prosecutrix as well as of the petitioners.

passed the order dated 29.4.2016. She has also pointed out to this Court that according to their version, they do not need protection for further in absence of any threat.

Learned advocate Mr.H.R.Prajapati appearing with Mr. A.B.Munshi, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are before this Court seeking quashment of the complaint. The respondent No. 2-original complainant is not remained present so far.

The Investigating Officer requires time of one day to record the further statement of the original complainant. Considering the fact that the complaint is against the petitioner No.1 for luring the daughter of the complainant and abducting her and marrying with the prosecutrix & Certificate of Registration of Marriage is on record. The matter shall be finally decided tomorrow once the additional statement is recorded. Till the Court directs further, protection shall continue to them.

With these directions, this petition stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid Page 2 of 3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Fri May 06 00:24:44 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/10148/2016 ORDER extent.

Let the main matter appear on 6th May, 2016 . The ad-interim relief granted earlier shall continue till further order in the main matter.

(MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) BINA Page 3 of 3 HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Fri May 06 00:24:44 IST 2016