(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Learned counsel for the appellant could not challenge the conclusion recorded by learned Single Judge in the impugned order to the effect that the appellant was appointed by his father, who was Chairman of the employer-Market Committee, and no procedure, as prescribed in the Rules, had been followed in appointment and continuation of the appellant in service. Grievance of the appellant before learned Single Judge and before this Court was that the principles of natural justice were violated in discharging him from service. Therefore, a specific query was made as regards prejudice, if any, caused to the appellant, in view of the glaring and admitted facts of the case. The appellant having failed to show any grievance and the case being one of stark nepotism in employment in a public institution, the appeal is not required to be entertained, and hence, it is summarily dismissed along with Civil Application.
(D.H.Waghela, J.) (M.D.Shah, J.) *malek Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.