MUKESHBHAI RAMNIKLAL PANCHAL (KARELIA) Versus SHREEJI DEVELOPERS BUILDERS AND ORGANISERS KAUSHIKBAHI NANUBHAI PATEL ========================================================== Appearance:
MR DEVARSHI C SHAH for the PETITIONER(s) No. MR BHAVESH B CHOKSHI for the RESPONDENT(s) No. MR KIRAN C RAVAL for the RESPONDENT(s) No. ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH and HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J. SHASTRI Date : 10/01/2020 IA ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATH)
1. We have heard Shri Devarshi C. Shah, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Bhavesh B.
Chokshi, learned counsel representing respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5.
2. For the reasons recorded in the affidavit filed in support of the impleadment application, the application is allowed. Even Shri Chokshi has no objection to the same. Let the applicant be impleaded as opposite party No.5 in the main Contempt Application. Let the main Contempt Application be Page 1 of 2 Downloaded on : Sat Jan 11 01:44:38 IST 2020 C/MCA/333/2019 IA ORDER listed on 14.02.2020.
3. The impleadment application stands disposed of.
(VIKRAM NATH, CJ) (A.J. SHASTRI, J) GAURAV J THAKER Page 2 of 2 Downloaded on : Sat Jan 11 01:44:38 IST 2020