Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Satveer Tyagi And Anr vs State Of U P And Anr

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 August, 2019
Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29207 of 2019 Applicant :- Satveer Tyagi And Anr Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of impugned non bailable warrant orders dated 25.7.2018 and 12.7.2019 passed by the A.C.J.M. III, Gautam Budh Nagar in Case No. 2147 of 2013, State vs. Satveer Tyagi, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., arising out of charge sheet filed in Case Crime No. 161 of 2013, P.S.- Greater Noida, District- Gautam Budh Nagar.
Heard Sri Shriram Dubey, Advocate holding brief of the applicants' counsel as well as learned AGA and perused the record.
The Court does not see any illegality, impropriety and incorrectness in the impugned orders under challenge and also there seem to be no abuse of court's process. There is no good ground to interfere in the same, therefore, the prayer for quashing of the impugned orders is refused.
Applicants' counsel submits that as it is being desired by the accused to obtain bail after surrendering in the court below, a protective direction may be issued to the lower court to decide the proposed bail application.
In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in case after surrendering in the court below an application for bail is moved on behalf of the accused within ten days from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
In the aforesaid period or till the date of appearance of the accused in the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive measures shall be taken or given effect to.
It is made clear that if this order is not availed by the accused within stipulated period of time, no time extension application shall be entertained.
It is further clarified that this order has been passed only with regard to the accused on behalf of whom this application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved in this Court.
With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 6.8.2019 Naresh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Judges
  • Karuna Nand Bajpayee
Advocates
  • Uma Nath Pandey