1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Patel Yogeshkumar Sakalchand vs State Of Gujarat & 2

High Court Of Gujarat|04 May, 2016
Heard Ms. Kruti Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Taranjit Singh Wadhwa, learned AGP for the respondent authorities.
2. The controversy in the petition as well as the prayer is limited. It is the case of the petitioner that the vehicle owned by him being Truck No. GJ-18- AV-4784 came to be seized by the respondent mining authorities on the ground of alleged breaches of Gujarat Mineral (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage)(Amendment) Rules, 2005.
3. While proceedings against the petitioner for alleged breaches have to go on in accordance with law and the same is also not subject matter of present petition, the only prayer made is for release of the vehicle in question seized by the respondent mining authorities.
4. In this regard, Rule 18 of the Rules empowers the Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu May 05 03:27:40 IST 2016 C/SCA/7590/2016 ORDER competent authority to release the vehicle on compliance of conditions provided for in the Rule. It appears from the record that the petitioner has already made an application in writing to the competent authority on 03.05.2016, wherein readiness is shown to comply conditions including furnishing of bond in Form-L.
5. In aforesaid view of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondent no.2 competent authority to consider the question of release of the vehicle of the petitioner being Truck bearing registration No. GJ-18-AV-4784 in accordance with law within 5 days from the date of receipt of this order.
Direct service is permitted.
(N.V.ANJARIA, J.) chandrashekhar Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Thu May 05 03:27:40 IST 2016
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.