M/S Mayur Printers vs Commissioner Of Central Excise ...
High Court Of Gujarat|08 January, 2020
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) Mr. Anand Nainawati, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant makes a statement that he has instructions from his client not to press this civil application seeking condonation of delay of 530 days in preferring Tax Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and withdraw the same. According to Mr. Nainawati, his client has availed of the benefit of 'Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. In view of such statement being made, this civil application is disposed of as not pressed. As the civil application seeking condonation of delay is not pressed and is being disposed of, the Tax Appeal would not survive and the same also stands disposed of. Rule issued in the civil application seeking condonation of delay stands discharged. It goes without saying that in the event if the declaration is rejected, then it shall be open for the applicant to avail of an appropriate legal remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J) (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J) CHANDRESH Page 1 of 1 Downloaded on : Thu Jan 09 23:58:44 IST 2020
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.