Malti Mehta & vs Education Multimedia Research ...
High Court Of Gujarat|01 May, 2007
1. Learned advocate Mr. Nayan Parekh for learned advocate Mr. A.J. Yagnik appearing on behalf of petitioner seeks permission to delete respondent No.4 who remains unserved since long. Accordingly, permission as prayed for is granted. Respondent No.4 is ordered to deleted from the cause title. It is directed to the petitioner to amend the cause title accordingly.
2. None of the advocate appearing on behalf of respondents is remained present before this Court today.
3. The present matter has been adjourned for 18 occasions. No reply is filed by any of respondent.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.