1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Mahalaxmi vs Amita

High Court Of Gujarat|03 February, 2010
The learned advocate for the petitioner may file an application stating that efforts have been made to serve respondents Nos.4 to 8 and whether the correct addresses of the said respondents are available, or not.
Chinmay Gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted before the Court that the said respondents have remained unserved before the Trial Court and respondents Nos.4 to 8 are formal parties and no relief has been claimed against respondents Nos.6 to 8, in the suit. Necessary material in support of this submissions may be placed on record, by way of affidavit. List on 02.03.2010.
Abhilasha Kumari, J.) ~gaurav~ Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.