Lakhabhai Kalubhai Bharwad vs State Of Gujarat

Learned advocate, Mr. Mahesh Poojara has received instruction to appear in the matter for respondent no.2

- original first informant. He is permitted to file his Vakilatnama in the Registry.

Heard learned advocate, Mr. Kishan Daiya for the applicants, learned APP Mr. Raval for the respondent no.1 - State and learned advocate, Mr. Poojara for the respondent no.2 - original complainant.

It is submitted by learned advocate appearing for the respective parties that matter is settled out of the Court and, therefore, the original complainant and the witness both have filed affidavits, which are placed on record. It is also submitted by learned advocate for the applicants that the original first informant as well as the witness both are present in his office.

Upon making inquiry from the complainant as well as witnesses, both have stated that if the FIR in Page 1 of 2 Downloaded on : Fri Aug 28 03:36:09 IST 2020 R/CR.MA/12039/2020 ORDER question is quashed and set aside, they have no objection.

In view of the above, Notice returnable on 3rd September, 2020.

Learned APP Mr .R.B.Ravel for respondent no.1 - State of Gujarat and learned advocate, Mr. Mahesh Poojara for the respondent no.2 waive service of notice of Rule.

As the settlement has been arrived at between the parties, the applicants shall not be arrested till returnable date.

Direct service is permitted. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Court/authority by Fax or Email forthwith.

(VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.) SRILATHA Page 2 of 2 Downloaded on : Fri Aug 28 03:36:09 IST 2020