1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Kraze vs Official

High Court Of Gujarat|07 May, 2010
1. Respondent No.2 Punjab National Bank is represented through learned advocate Mr.K.M.Parikh. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 is not remaining present. Today also, the matter is required to be adjourned due to sick note filed by learned advocate appearing on behalf of respondent No.2. Under the circumstances, S.O. to 21/07/2010.
2. Registry is directed to issue fresh Notice to respondent No.2, making it returnable on 21/07/2010 informing that his advocate is not remaining present in the Court and this Court is required to adjourn the matter only because of non-availability of his advocate.
[M.R.SHAH,J] *dipti Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.