Jignesh @ Jigo @ Jigar ... vs State Of Gujarat

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH) 1.00. Despite our earlier orders dated 21/3/2016 and 31/3/2016, the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the applicant have chosen to remain absent. Present application for suspension of the sentence is of the year 2015 and the same has been adjourned on all the occasions due to non- availability of the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the applicant.

2.00. As observed in our earlier order dated 31/3/2016, we were ready to go on with the final hearing of the main Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Tue May 03 02:42:13 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/19592/2015 ORDER Criminal Appeal and the same was adjourned to today for final hearing on the assurance given by the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant that they will go on with the final hearing of the main appeal and today is the date which was reported to be convenient to the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the applicant.

However, despite the above, the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the applicant have chosen to remain absent. Under the circumstances, S.O. to 20/6/2016.

Sd/-

(M.R.SHAH, J.) Sd/-

(A.J. SHASTRI, J.) Rafik..

HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Tue May 03 02:42:13 IST 2016