1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Jagatpal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 November, 2017
Court No. - 24
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43321 of 2017 Applicant :- Jagatpal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to gang chart, only one case has been shown against the accused applicant and he is on bail. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is languishing in jail since 24.1.2017 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, provision for initiation of cases and release of the accused in U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Jagatpal involved in Case Crime No. 248 of 2016, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Pahari, District - Chitrakoot be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Order Date :- 8.11.2017 A. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
  • Aniruddha Singh
  • Raj Kumar Singh