Idrish Urfe Bhaiyo Urfe Mamu Urfe ... vs State Of Gujarat

IDRISH URFE BHAIYO URFE MAMU URFE BHURIYO URFE GIRISH MANNUKHA SHAIKH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance:

ADILHUSHAIN M SAIYED(9723) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS MD MEHTA, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI Date : 24/07/2020

1.Issue rule returnable on 31.07.2020. Ms.M.D.Mehta, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of respondent.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor may furnish the connection of the present applicant with the crime in question in the instant case.

3. According to learned advocate Mr. Adilhussain Saiyed for the applicant, the has alleged to have 18 criminal antecedents. However, he has no role to play, so far as the present case is concerned in which he is said to be a receiver, but, there is nothing to connect him with the crime.

Page 1 of 2 Downloaded on : Mon Jul 27 21:42:13 IST 2020

R/CR.MA/8449/2020 ORDER

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor shall also furnish the details of papers of charge sheet and shall keep the copies ready on the returnable date.

(MS. SONIA GOKANI, J. ) MISHRA AMIT V./sudhir Page 2 of 2 Downloaded on : Mon Jul 27 21:42:13 IST 2020