IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6431 of 1993 For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG =========================================================
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
Whether this case involves a substantial
4 question of law as to the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?
5 Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
========================================================= HANSJIBHAI VECHANBHAI VASAVA Versus MINOR SARDHIBEN & OTHERS ========================================================= Appearance :
MR DN PANDYA for Petitioner ========================================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.GARG Date : 30/04/2007 ORAL JUDGMENT
1. On 28.2.2007, Mr. Pandya informed the Court that the sole petitioner had expired long back. He prayed for some time to make appropriate application for substitution of the legal representatives. Time of six weeks was granted to the petitioner. Today, Mr. Pandya submits that the petitioner's legal representatives have not made any application for substitution.
2. In view of the death of the petitioner and that no application for substitution of legal representatives has been made, this petition at the instance of a dead man cannot be continued. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. Interim Relief, if any, is vacated.
[R.S.GARG, J.] mathew