1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Ayyub And Others vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20683 of 2019 Petitioner :- Ayyub And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J. Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Sri Rakesh Pandey for the petitioners, Sri J.K. Upadhyay for the State-respondents and Sri B.D. Sharma for the private respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner/s submits that he is not pressing this petition so far as it relates to quashing of impugned FIR. He further submits that in view of the notification No.1058/79-V-1-19-1 (Ka)-20-2018 dated 6th June 2019, provisions of anticipatory bail have been made applicable in the State of Uttar Pradesh and, therefore, the petitioner/s may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. before the competent Court.
Counsel for the petitioner/s further submits that Registry may be directed to return certified copy of the FIR.
Learned State Counsel has no objection to this proposition.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed, as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.
Needless to state that in the eventuality of filing any such application by the petitioner/s, the same would be decided in accordance with law.
Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the FIR to the counsel for the petitioner/s after accepting xerox copy of the same.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 SK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
  • Pritinker Diwaker
  • Rakesh Pandey