1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Amitkumar Bhagvanjibhai ... vs State Of Gujarat & 4

High Court Of Gujarat|04 May, 2016
1. The petitioners are the victims of the incident in question. It is his say that petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 have sustained as many as seven fractures over their bodies. The photographs of the injured along with medical case papers have been placed on record. Learned Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Rao, has urged that despite such serious injuries, Sections 323 and 324 only are added, so far. He has urged that all the persons, who are arraigned as accused, belong to a particular community and the IO also belongs to the very particular community. Therefore, the investigation may not go on right track.
2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the FIR is of recent origin, and hence, it will be too premature to say anything Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Sat May 07 04:32:04 IST 2016 R/SCR.A/3034/2016 ORDER at this juncture.
3. Having heard both the sides, while NOTICE is being issued, making the same returnable on 7TH JUNE, 2016, it is directed that the Superintendent of Police, Rajkot (Rural), shall oversee and monitor the investigation. Periodical report of such investigation shall be submitted before the Superior Officer by the concerned IO. Let the IO remain present with all the papers of investigation on the returnable date.
(MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) UMESH Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Sat May 07 04:32:04 IST 2016
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.